Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Exit polling done by the bias press.
1 posted on 11/02/2004 11:58:14 AM PST by demlosers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: demlosers

To the HWA (hand-wringers of America):

Channel your negative energy

Don't assume anything. Call!

http://www.georgewbush.com/call/

If you don't see anything on this page - you need to sign up!

A good way for Freeps in safe (Red OR Blue) states to help in the battlegrounds.


2 posted on 11/02/2004 12:02:07 PM PST by Grit ('For the love of my brother, and for the love of my country.' - Pat Tillman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: demlosers

How about no polling period within the last week of the campaign.


3 posted on 11/02/2004 12:02:29 PM PST by bahblahbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: demlosers

When you tell 'em "F#&@ You" do they count that as a Kerry vote?


4 posted on 11/02/2004 12:03:59 PM PST by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: demlosers

The problem isn't exit pollers. The problem is members of Moveon.org and ACT posing as exit pollers in order to harass and intimidate GOP voters.


5 posted on 11/02/2004 12:04:26 PM PST by Dont Mention the War (How important a Senator can you be if Dick Cheney's never told you to "go [bleep] yourself"?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: demlosers

I am against exit polling and early calling of the election results. The leftist media just use this tool to manipulate the public.


6 posted on 11/02/2004 12:07:11 PM PST by The Ghost of FReepers Past (Legislatures are so outdated. If you want real political victory, take your issue to court.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: demlosers
Hmm. The plain text of the statute excludes anyone except voters and officials from 100 feet of the polling place. Yet, the judge overturns that law because of the media's claim that it infringes their First Amendment-derived right to report the news?

Sigh. The First Amendment protects the media's right to publish information. It does not protect a "right" to collect information. If it did, then the government would have no ability to keep any information secret. Reporters would have to be allowed to broadcast secret intelligence briefings, criminal court proceedings, jury deliebrations, etc.

8 posted on 11/02/2004 12:09:41 PM PST by Chemist_Geek ("Drill, R&D, and conserve" should be our watchwords! Energy independence for America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: demlosers
When you tell 'em "F#&@ You" do they count that as a Kerry vote?

Apparently, that isn’t too far from the truth. Gallup, supposedly, was taking people who refused to talk with them after exiting early voting sites and marking them for Kerry.

11 posted on 11/02/2004 12:14:37 PM PST by bushisdamanin04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: demlosers

First: When I was a child, your vote was known only to you. Not your wife, not your kids. They knew what party you stood behind, but not your actual vote.

Second, NO ONE asked you before or after you went. It eliminated all efforts at intimidation, AND eliminated the power the MEDIA has to PREDICT/FORECAST, basically suck you up into watching TV so they can hawk products for their advertisers.


We ought to insist it be this way again. Betcha if we did, the MSM's would file lawsuits. I don't know how they could FORCE anyone to tell, but if everyone cooperated and WOULD NOT TELL, the MSM would lose all it's POWER, and actually have to resort to RESEACHING FACTS, REPORTING THE TRUTH, etc.


14 posted on 11/02/2004 1:06:33 PM PST by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: demlosers

too late to organize this now but there should have been a concentrated effort to get out this message to conservatives:

"If you are approached by an exit poller just say you voted for Kerry"

a) it will keep them from harassing you
b) it would skew the numbers on the news and help drive more conservatives to the polls
c) it would skew the numbers so badly on the news that it would be shown for how useless it is


16 posted on 11/02/2004 1:12:29 PM PST by kpp_kpp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson