Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ican'tbelieveit

I thought I read that PA had new voting machines. 400+ would seem like an acceptable trial amount for ballots and voting machines. I also can see a use for having a second reading for ALL votes registered in all elections so they know when the machine is getting too old.

But all charges need to be checked out. If it has two readings on the machine and one is at zero and one is at 400+ then this sounds legitimate to me....just make sure the votes are tallied with TODAYS votes only!


318 posted on 11/02/2004 7:57:51 AM PST by Illinois Rep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 308 | View Replies ]


To: Illinois Rep

So we will need a history of these machines. Have they been used in elections before. Is this the first time they are being used.


321 posted on 11/02/2004 7:59:33 AM PST by ican'tbelieveit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 318 | View Replies ]

To: Illinois Rep
I thought I read that PA had new voting machines. 400+ would seem like an acceptable trial amount for ballots and voting machines.

Wouldn't all the machines have at least that number on them? Why did they just question a few machines?

337 posted on 11/02/2004 8:07:47 AM PST by pepperhead (Kennedy's float, Mary Jo's don't!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 318 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson