I don't agree. The Times knows very well what they are doing and know they can ride out any flack, just like CBS.
YOU BET'CHA!
As Rush has referred to them many times in the past, they are "willing accomplices" in the media. The only thing that is different about this election is that the MSM has dropped any pretense of being objective. The only thing that will change that is the power of the marketplace. Make their viewership/circulation/ad revenue drop, and they will suddenly see the light.
(Or preferrably just go away.)
You said it better, but, I still say the Times has fleas.
Besides, the media can easily be compared to fleas--parasites sucking the blood out of the unsuspecting. People who swallow the pap they dispense stand in for dogs, and don't we all know a few of them, the ones who think anything from MSM speaks absolute truth?