Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Liz

More likely the latter than the former I think. However, if he says Bush has an 8 point overall lead, that doesn't really tell us anything about the state-by-state results. You know Bush is doubling up Kerry in Texas, Oklahoma, and a few other state. But Florida, Ohio, Wisconsin etc. - that's what's really important.


2 posted on 11/01/2004 3:04:08 PM PST by JustaCowgirl (Terrorists will "global test" us right off the planet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: JustaCowgirl
You know Bush is doubling up Kerry in Texas, Oklahoma, and a few other state.

Yeah...and deep blue, early voting California has more people in it than Texas and Oklahoma combined, the entire blue state of Oregon is early voting by mail, etc. It cuts both ways.

14 posted on 11/01/2004 3:07:52 PM PST by kesg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: JustaCowgirl

I remember hearing Dick Morris after the 2000 debacle. (I hope I remember these numbers correctly.) He said that the electoral college can be won by one man, and the popular vote another, but it was extremely unlikely that it could happen with more than a 1 1/2% difference.

In other words, if Bush goes over 2%, it would be highly unlikely to lose the electoral college. This was a statistical analysis. Of course, nothing about this election is usual or ordinary. But if Bush wins by a number near 8%, I don't think there is a snowballs chance in hell Kerry can put the states together for an EV win.


34 posted on 11/01/2004 3:21:31 PM PST by I still care (America is not the problem - it is the solution..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson