Posted on 11/01/2004 6:46:21 AM PST by Cultural Jihad
You'll note it said he was running for the front door which would have put him inside the polling area. That's when the officer physically stopped him.
If that was what he was alleged to have done, shouldn't he have been charged with violating one of those laws? However, that is not what he has been charged with. According to the article, "James S. Henry, of Sag Harbor, N.Y., was charged with disorderly conduct and resisting arrest without violence." In other words, it is a made-up, trumped-up charge, and likely a false arrest.
If they ask you to leave and you don't, then you are trespassing. You see it on the news all the time because usually the store owners don't care (free advertising) and they don't ask you to leave.
Say what?
A freelance journalist taking pictures of voters waiting outside the Palm Beach County elections headquarters ... Cinque was enforcing new rules, enacted Friday by elections chief Theresa LePore, that prohibit reporters from talking with or photographing voters waiting outside polling stations.
"Heading toward the front door" does not mean "inside the polling area" or "conducting a prohibited activity within X feet of the polling area".
Okay, I don't have time for this. But check out James S. Henry's web site. It's good to know why he was there and what his viewpoint is about our elections and the procedures.
Don't have time for what - the facts?
Nice try. But I have to go to work. Did you ask why Mr. Henry was really there?
Hmmm... I don't see how that has anything to do with elections officials handing down unconstitutional decrees, or law enforcement personnel making arrests based on false pretenses...
You're the one who said he was inside. But he wasn't. So now you try to change the subject.
Orlando Salinas, in Palm Beach, just had his cameraman pan the line of waiting voters.
If I tell you 'please I do not want you taking pictures of me, my wife or children' and you insist on ignoring my wishes and start taking pictures anyway....
First I am going to take your camera away from you, next expose the film....and then you are not going to like where I am going to shove your camera .......
Capice?
There is a great quote from photographer Diane Arbus who did a lot of portraiture and street photography (like Weegee did before her).
It is along the lines: "Having your picture taken is the risk you face for going out in public."
9 to 1 Michael Moore won't even be running the camera in Florida. He never rolled tape in Iraq, let alone visited the country.
Michael Moore will want to be ON CAMERA in Florida.
The question is will his flunkies be willing to go to jail for him? Sure it is a good headline for his clippings folder to have "Michael Moore crew arrested for filming in Florida (without a permit)" but we know that we will never see a headline "Michael Moore arrested for...".
Why go to jail when ANYONE being arrested will get the same headline without having to actually go to jail.
The World is Watching!
His speech was slurred, his eyes were bloodshot, and he was unsteady on his feet; the suspect was bleeding down his shirt in a small trickle.??
Why don't you go shoot somebody?
????
Case law varies quite a bit from state to state as to what constitutes a public place. Generally, the rules are that it is a place where privacy cannot be assumed, the general public is freely able to visit and is not private property.
However, as a photojournalist, I avoid photographing people who don't want to be photographed unless there is an overriding news reason to photograph them. For example, a random voter who asks not to be photographed won't end up in the paper while a known party activist who is trying to keep somthing hidden will be photographed if that thing is newsworthy.
isn't that how the pollsters get an idea of who is winning the race?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.