With the exception of some minor charges against Lt. John F. Kerry, all else about which may be read or heard in public, is in regard to high crimes against the United States, which means that it is still subject to participation under the U.C.M.J. at the direction of the President.
(President Carter's blanket amnesty, did not apply, because it was for people who had evaded military service, which John Kerry did not do, despite his military maneuvers to avoid further exposure in Vietnam.)
President Bush has said to this possibility, NO! This is not going to happen on his watch. "John Kerry has served honorably." End of story.
Now, to expose enough information of the investigations by the military in the late 1960's and early 1970's, that would show that Lt. John F. Kerry was then a suspect under investigation because of his associations with communists, foreign and domestic, and that such investigative procedures gave rise to less then Honorable processing of Lt. Kerry's "records career" through the maze of the Dept. of Defense, would present President Bush with the problem of whether or not, to prosecute, in order to uphold the laws of the United States.
He has said, No.
No means No.
Not going to happen.
There is no case against John F. Kerry. Anybody who wishes to pursue this further, is going to find themselves hanging, hoisted up by their own attempts at gathering attention, or suffering from richochet.
Carter's amnesty was not just for draft dogers.
"This could have been under President Carter's Executive Order 11967, under which thousands received pardons and upgrades for harsh discharges or other offenses under the Selective Service Act."
Then it appears that the rich can get away with anything. Nothing new, but I was hoping that the USA was better than that(especially in the case of TREASON).