To: Paul_B
"Or is this just more political calculation from the Party of cynicism, knowing this issue would be explosive among Evangelicals and RCs?"
I am anything but a defender of the Breck Girl and Liz, but if the fact Liz may have used donor eggs would be an "explosive" issue among evangelicals and religious conservatives, those particular evangelicals and religious conservatives should be ashamed of themselves.
This is nobody's business. Nobody's. I am amazed Slate would run this story.
31 posted on
10/31/2004 8:19:05 PM PST by
NCPAC
(Social Darwinists Unite!)
To: NCPAC
I would be fine if they would keep family matters to themselves. But when they crassly bring up Mary Cheney's lesbianism for political points, they open their own lives to scrutiny, because the issue has then become character.
And as the article points out, Ms. Edwards' silence here is uncharacteristic, especially considering she could do everyone, particularly her own kids, a lot of good by airing the issues of artificial insemination.
Of course, if they tossed fertilized eggs, they have reason to fear the airing of this issue.
34 posted on
10/31/2004 8:25:08 PM PST by
Paul_B
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson