Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Josh in PA
The only difference from the actual 2000 results, is New Mexico and Wisconsin.

So, basically your model was dead on in 2000. N. Mex was actually closer than Florida, and it can be argued that turnout was depressed by the early erroneous call for Gore. Also, NM was probably overturnable had Bush pushed a recount because of the tainted ballots that were allowed.

Wisconsin was only a Gore state because of the documented fraud in Milwaukee.

You have me sold :-)

109 posted on 10/31/2004 7:54:15 PM PST by commish (Freedom Tastes Sweetest to Those Who Have Fought to Preserve It)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]


To: commish


There was also a snowstorm in rural New Mexico that was said to hurt turnout there.. and Nader support fell off in both New Mexico and Wisconsin.


123 posted on 10/31/2004 8:02:34 PM PST by Josh in PA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson