[rocklobster11]

The bottom line is that he was pardoned (by Carter) and eventually given an honorable discharge. Thus there are no legal repurcussions. This is just information that should be available to the voter prior to making a decision. However, if you read the article, an inference is not proof, and they have presented no concrete proof or corroborating witnesses.

There is no way this gets out in the media without absolute proof. Perhaps Lipscomb has gotten the then Secretary of Navy to come forward, and will be publishing a story tomorrow. If not, this is going nowhere.

[brewcrew]

There is no way this gets out in the media without absolute proof. Perhaps Lipscomb has gotten the then Secretary of Navy to come forward, and will be publishing a story tomorrow. If not, this is going nowhere.

I don't care if it doesn't come out until after the election, personally. I just want it to come out. Mainly so I can take satisfaction in all the kool-aid drinkers seeing who they really voted for.

[Craig3281]

Absolutely correct without documentary proof or someone of notoriety willing to state unequivocally as fact it's going nowhere. Even Drudge refuses to run with it.