Skip to comments.
“This House Would Re-Elect George W. Bush”
Oxford Union Debate - 28th October 2004 ^
| October 28, 2004
| Professor Colleen Graffy
Posted on 10/31/2004 2:14:28 PM PST by DBeers
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-25 last
To: MNnice
Yep. Exactly. They will perpetrate the myth Kerry is smarter, but we all know Bush is quite intelligent. Just because he isn't the greatest speaker in the world, doesn't mean he can't analyze, evalute, and synthesize information. If half the so called experts had accomplished half of what Bush has, then I might respect their so called expertise.
To: quidnunc
The announcer breezed by it at the end. I believe it was 75 in favor of the motion (to re-elect the President) and 230-ish against.
22
posted on
10/31/2004 3:23:22 PM PST
by
jwm3
To: jwm3
I believe it was 75 in favor of the motion (to re-elect the President) and 230-ish against. So much education and so little smarts.
23
posted on
10/31/2004 3:31:34 PM PST
by
AHerald
("Be what you is, cuz if you be what you ain't, then you ain't what you is.")
To: DBeers
24
posted on
10/31/2004 4:12:40 PM PST
by
Valin
(Out Of My Mind; Back In Five Minutes)
To: DBeers
Why can't the Republicans/White House argue this effectively?
25
posted on
10/31/2004 6:18:56 PM PST
by
Finalapproach29er
({about the news media} "We'll tell you any sh** you want hear" : Howard Beale --> NETWORK)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-25 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson