To: Cincinatus' Wife
Badnarik will garner the fewest votes ever for a Libertarian Presidential candidate. I doubt he will recieve more than .05% of the vote, or 600,000 votes
6 posted on
10/31/2004 12:49:02 AM PDT by
MJY1288
(A MONDAY MORNING QUARTERBACK HAS NEVER LED ANY TEAM TO VICTORY)
To: MJY1288
Badnarik will garner the fewest votes ever for a Libertarian Presidential candidate Perhaps. But Losertarian votes cost the GOP two senate seats by siphoning off conservitive voters. A Pox on them.
19 posted on
10/31/2004 12:56:51 AM PDT by
Drango
(NPR- When government funds a "news" outlet that has a bias...it's no longer news...it's propaganda.)
To: MJY1288
600, 000 is greater than the number of votes Gore got over Bush in 2000. Badnarik-- an Austinite backed by Leftwing money-- could cost Bush the election. This guy is a fraud. It's easy to claim you're a big libertarian when you're really a tool for the Left.
To: MJY1288
600,000 being .05% would mean there'd be 1.2 billion voters. Do you mean 0.5%? Even then there'd be 120 million, which I suppose is possible but only 108 million voted in 2000.
86 posted on
10/31/2004 1:03:43 AM PST by
JohnBDay
To: MJY1288
Badnarik will garner the fewest votes ever for a Libertarian Presidential candidate. I doubt he will recieve more than .05% of the vote, or 600,000 votes I think 600,000 vote would make him the second-highest presidential vote-getting in LP history.
To: MJY1288
Badnarik will garner the fewest votes ever for a Libertarian Presidential candidate. I doubt he will recieve more than .05% of the vote, or 600,000 votes Do you mean 60K? Browne got 0.36 percent or 384k in 2000.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson