Zogby is normally right on in Presidential years. Don't discount his numbers.
I dont recall him being around in 1992 and 1996. Do you have any numbers for those years??? Being right one year doesnt make one an expert!
Here's why I find this article interesting.
Zogby DOES have a good reputation. But, by changing his results, he is saying he screwed up the INITIAL poll so badly that it skewed the results by 3 whole points (that's a huge error!).
What other polls might he be screwing up---but no "reporters" or Rat campaign workers demanded he change them?
Right? I think he adjusts his numbers to confirm his next press release. More than any other pollsters he is quoted too too much. His results and the statistics that got them should speak for themselves. His edification is suspect.
2000 - Gore 48, Bush 46, Nader 5
Does that look right to you?
How is President Gore doing today?
I don't discount anything but President Gore and Senator Lazio might have been well advised to discount his results in 2000.
I can't understand why he has any sort of a reputation at all, or maybe the polls he takes the rest of the year explain why cars now have 3 cupholders for every seat.
Zog piss gets the state poll numbers wrong all the time.
Zogby was one of two pollers that was close in the 2000 election. Once does not make for a record. IMHO