No. However, every effort should be used to be sensitive to the objections of gun rights advocates.
Well then, there you have it. No, it doesn't. But they'll be "sensitive" to our concerns.
Did the AWB violate the Second Amendment? No, but they were sensitive to our concerns. Would a ban of all semiautomatic shotguns and rifles, and all handguns of every style, violate the Second Amendment? No, but they will be sensitive to our concerns when they enact it.
The information that retailers obtain about the bullet purchaser should not be available to anyone but law enforcement.
What business does LE have knowing who owns what? If the purpose of the Second Amendment is to repel tyranny in government, then giving the government any say or visibility into the process is a conflict of interest.
Whew, that's a relief!
Kinda contradictory, isn't it? I know that the Ca. DOJ has a list of every firearm I own. Even though we don't formally register our guns, every purchase made in California must go through an FFL, including purchases made from private parties. The background check info goes to the CDOJ. They keep it in a database.
California does not have a RTKBA amendment in its state constitution, and the 9th Circuit Court of tyrants has ruled that there is NO individual right to keep and bear arms. Every year the state legislature introduces and passes a slew of new gun control legislation. This is just the first proposal for the new legislative year. These people won't rest until firearm and ammo sales are virtually halted.