Posted on 10/29/2004 9:22:28 PM PDT by Johny_Coge
It would be silly to reargue the whole war again. But the salient point is that Kerry is the candidate of those who disagree with all that. He's the candidate for those who think America was wrong in Iraq and too gung-ho on the war on terror. Indeed, in a recent New York Times profile, Kerry admitted that 9/11 hadn't changed his thinking about foreign policy "much at all." And that his aim was to return to the way it was in the 1990s, when terrorism was a "nuisance." The problem is that many Americans believe that treating terrorism like a nuisance is precisely why 9/11 happened. For all the talk about Bush's denial, a vote for Kerry is a vote for an even deadlier denial.
(Excerpt) Read more at nationalreview.com ...
Didn't change his thinking about foreign policy "MUCH AT ALL"??#$?@#$#@
You can't change rock-solid ignorance.
bttt
I've been posting for several months (reading for four years, almost) and I thought I could figure it out eventually, but I can't. What does bttt mean?
With great patience, ignorance is sometimes fixable. Stupidity, on the other hand, is not.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.