And the resistance shouldn't have risen up against Hitler's Germany because it only antagonized the Nazis?
There are things we are called to do to put down a violent order.
The more Islam radicalizes (once again, as it has historically done), the more we will push for "peaceful muslims" to reform their religion and eradicate the "false teaching" radical mosques/clerics.
Mohammed wrote a lovely bit of self-protection into the book of his blood cult. The more efforts that are made to control Islam (and suppress it), the more they call for a physical holy war (jihad), and the more pressing the need to eradicate the whole antiChristian cult (it is a religion of the antiChrist because it incorporates a rewritten version of the New Testament that denies the divinity of Christ and the resurrection; it leads the flock astray).
I am content to permit a religion called "Islam" to exist and be practiced but the blood cult that we face today cannot co-exist with other faiths. They see a social order of muslims, Christians/Jews (who are "of the book" but lesser people under Islamic law), and "everybody else" (who are even lower); this cannot be permitted in today's global society.
There are 34 conflicts currently ongoing around the world. How many involve muslims?
Reform or perish.
I don't agree with the theory, I was merely articulating, in response to the question "why would anyone think UBL wants Bush to win?" I don't think they are correct, but I do think AQ wants as extreme a response from the US as they can get. The immediate effect of a terrorist attack is not the point - the response is the point.
Intriguing point. I am wondering if Bin Laden fancies himself to be a modern Anti-Christ.
I guess we'll soon see if he has the ability to conquer death, or does his escape from Tora Bora count?