Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rocklobster11

Is this good news for Bush, and if so, how?


8 posted on 10/29/2004 8:31:51 AM PDT by CatOwner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: CatOwner
Is this good news for Bush, and if so, how?

Because not only was it secured, it was destroyed. It wasn't looted, it's not in the hand of terrorists... it's destroyed.

Game. Set. Match.

14 posted on 10/29/2004 8:33:29 AM PDT by WhistlingPastTheGraveyard (liberals loathe humanity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: CatOwner

It's going to put the lie to the NY Times story, and make Kerry look like an uninformed, anti-military ASS.


15 posted on 10/29/2004 8:33:49 AM PDT by MamaLucci (Libs, want answers on 911? Ask Clinton why he met with Monica more than with his CIA director.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: CatOwner

If our troops disposed of the explosives, Kerry can't claim Bush negligence in guarding the explosives.


17 posted on 10/29/2004 8:34:28 AM PDT by AChargeToKeep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: CatOwner

"Is this good news for Bush, and if so, how?"

Now I'm confused, first we show satellite photos of "Russian trucks" moving the stuff before the war. Then ABC shows a tape dated 18 Apr, and now we say we destroyed it 13 April?


32 posted on 10/29/2004 8:36:54 AM PDT by blaquebyrd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: CatOwner

"Is this good news for Bush, and if so, how?"

Now I'm confused, first we show satellite photos of "Russian trucks" moving the stuff before the war. Then ABC shows a tape dated 18 Apr, and now we say we destroyed it 13 April?


35 posted on 10/29/2004 8:37:00 AM PDT by blaquebyrd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: CatOwner

>>Is this good news for Bush, and if so, how?<<

Have you been in a cocoon lately??

Don't pay attention to the news??


58 posted on 10/29/2004 8:38:56 AM PDT by sissyjane (Silk pajamas for dress up, and flannel for everyday-perfect Freeper wardrobe!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: CatOwner
>>>>Is this good news for Bush, and if so, how?

Unless there is conclusive evidence released today refuting the original claims made by the NYTimes and others, this story is not good for PresBush`s reelection efforts. Period. Frankly, there is no time left in the campaign for this story to move off the political radar screen. The entire liberal establishment has been playing it up, for all its worth.

Drip, drip drip....

174 posted on 10/29/2004 8:49:32 AM PDT by Reagan Man (.....................................................The Choice is Clear....... Re-elect BUSH-CHENEY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: CatOwner
Is this good news for Bush, and if so, how?

Since President Bush did nothing wrong, nor did our troops, yes, it is good for him.

Let's look at the big picture here:

The bottom line allegation was our troops were not informed this type of material was at the complex and needed to be taken care of.

The media, and Kerry then outrageously embellished, stated the stuff was stolen by the enemy under our noses and is being used against our troops now and it's all Bush's fault.

The bottom line of all the stories since are that our troops were there, the stuff could not have been stolen all at once in large quantities after we were in Iraq, and the over-all evidence has always been that our troops have gathered up and secured/and or destroyed the material, as they continue to do up to this day.

The negligence argument from the media and Kerry is completely false.

322 posted on 10/29/2004 9:07:22 AM PDT by cyncooper (And an angel still rides in the whirlwind and directs this storm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson