Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Thoughtful Compatriot

Things the video says...

"missing explosives MAY have ties to their team"
"Area they were staying MAY have been close to Al Qaqaa... "

"THEY Determined (NOW) that their team MAY have been located near southern edge of the complex"

If they drove north based on the image, they didn't do so on roads as there were none on the screen that went north from their supposed location. If they drove on roads, it would not have put them there as the road that goes north goes west a long ways first.

They said they have no idea what they were really looking at.

They say bunkers near or on. There is no evidence the bunkers they looked at are part of the missing explosives.
For that matter, there is no evidence that the explosives we saw in the video are the ones that have been reported missing.

They said BE CLEAR, it MAY or MAY NOT be the material in question. How is this evidence? This sounds more like gossip.


17 posted on 10/29/2004 3:01:58 AM PDT by TruthCanHurt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: TruthCanHurt
This sounds more like gossip

To the left, gossip and evidence are interchangeable.

20 posted on 10/29/2004 3:13:06 AM PDT by jess35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson