Agree completely--very clear explanation. Especially liked his assessment of JO'N and don't know anyone who has met him describe him in less glowing terms--a thoroughly decent (not to mention courageous) man and patriot. And--unlike JFK's "band of bros"--utterly ineligible, by virtue of his self-imposed 527 status--for patronage plums of any kind when HIS guy retakes office. (Just a fact the MSM never seem to ponder when they're calculating "integrity.")