Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Boot Hill

Post a link to back your claim up. What you posted is not supported by the evidence.


42 posted on 10/29/2004 9:43:00 PM PDT by Destro (Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting johnathangaltfilms.com and jihadwatch.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]


To: Destro
"Post a link to back your claim up."

It sounds to me like you're asking for instructions on how to click on a link, like the one I gave you in post #33. Since you're having trouble with such basics, I'll post it for you here.

DoD Statement on Jack Shaw and the Iraq Telecommunications Contract

For several months there have been allegations in the press [that would be the July 7th LA Slimes story] that activities of John A. Shaw, Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for International Technology Security, were under investigation by the Inspector General of the Department of Defense (DoD IG). The allegations were examined by DoD IG criminal investigators in Baghdad and a criminal investigation was never opened.

Furthermore, attempts to discredit Shaw and his report on Iraqi telecommunications contracting matters were brought to the attention of the DoD IG and were accordingly referred to the FBI.

Shaw carried out his duties in the investigation of Iraqi telecommunications matters pursuant to the authorities spelled out in the Memorandum of Understanding between the DoD IG and the Acting Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology and Logistics. Shaw provided a copy of his report to the DOD IG and, at the request of the Coalition Provisional Authority, to the Iraqi National Communications and Media Commission.

Shaw is not now, nor has he ever been, under investigation by the DoD IG. Any questions concerning FBI activities should be addressed to the FBI.   (source)   (emphasis and bracketed comments added by Boot Hill)

Now what was that silliness of yours about "What you posted is not supported by the evidence"?

You knowingly posted a Libertarian Party hit piece about Bush that was fraudulently disguised to appear to be a news story and you got caught. Then just like Dan Rather, you suggested that we should ignore the fraud and look at what the article's claims. Well, Destro, now you have the evidence you claimed wasn't there, and you just got caught again.

In other words, genius, the July LA Slimes article was a hit piece, too! You really are a glutton for punishment, Destro. Do you want some more?

--Boot Hill

43 posted on 10/30/2004 2:07:32 AM PDT by Boot Hill (Candy-gram for Osama bin Mongo, candy-gram for Osama bin Mongo!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson