Replies

Libertarians are the enemy now? And you would take the word of a newspaper published by the Moonie cult - who think Rev. Moon is Jesus Christ - over a Libertarian publication?

Lastly, you went into a diatribe - yet could not disprove one word the editorial said about Gertz's one and only named source for this story - Earlier this year Shaw was reportedly involved in a controversy involving the former Iraqi golden boy and now criminal, Ahmed Chalabi. The scandal involved the awarding of cell phone contracts to three companies with close ties to Chalibi. According to the L.A. Times, he was put under investigation by the FBI.

Is that how credible you can get?

“Earlier this year Shaw was reportedly involved in a controversy involving the former Iraqi golden boy and now criminal, Ahmed Chalabi. The scandal involved the awarding of cell phone contracts to three companies with close ties to Chalibi. According to the L.A. Times, he was put under investigation by the FBI.”
(Originally posted by Destro as this threads "news article", where he failed to disclose that the actual source was the Libertarian Party national office.)

You see, this is how slimy your Libertarian source gets.

Yeah, Shaw was "involved in the controversy", because he was the one that uncovered, disclosed and thwarted the controversy, which "involved the awarding of cell phone contracts to three companies with close ties to Chalibi".

Just as Jack Shaw was at the forefront in the uncovering of the Israeli spy network operating inside DOD this year and working closely with the FBI in prosecuting that case, so to was he DOD's point man in the case you so falsely presented here. And for this reason, Rumsfeld and DOD stand foursquare behind Jack Shaw.

But the one good thing your fraudulent post and responses did here, was to confirm that you are knowingly acting as the Libertarian Party's point man for spreading those despicable lies here on FR and intentionally undermining Bush's leadership in the GWOT.

"Libertarians are the enemy now", you ask? Hell yes they are!

--Boot Hill

"According to the L.A. Times, he was put under investigation by the FBI.
Is that how credible you can get?"

The left/liberal LA Times is often not credible. And the social anarchist Libertarian Party is so despised here in the USA that it has very few members and no chance to appreciably affect politics.

Libertarian Party Official Platform
http://lp.org/issues/platform/preamble.html

And try the phrase, "Outright Libertarians" in a google.com search. ...something the Republican Party disagrees with very much, as we have seen by votes in the various states overwhelmingly in favor of marriage amendments against that sort of activism.

We conservatives do believe in our Creator here in the USA. With that, we are against conspiracy lies, socialist policies (along with the anarchist attempts to assist leftist propaganda, which tactic is reminiscent of pre-WWII German events), libertine pursuits, etc.

The Libertarian Party is a nearly unnoticeable opposition to our efforts. While ignoring the miniscule, irrelevant Libertarian efforts in our Campaign, we are dealing with our stronger opposition: the Democrat (socialist, empire-loving) Party.

Our US Democrats would rule Europe and the Caucasus, then suck it dry if they could stay in power long enough to do so. Even leftist Europeans would be wiser to stop supporting US Democrats so much. To support the irrelevant Libertarian Party is to support the Democrat Party. That's common knowledge among Republicans.