Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

THE DESPERATION OF THE DEMOCRATS
The American Partisan ^ | 29 October 2004 | Timothy Rollins

Posted on 10/28/2004 10:02:08 PM PDT by MrBallroom

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last
To: okie01
I don't believe it is. The eventual California totals include the absentee vote -- which was distributed between Bush and Gore in about the same proportions as the polling station vote.

I would like a definitive answer to this question...If the author is wrong he is discredited.

21 posted on 10/28/2004 11:34:42 PM PDT by Outraged
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Outraged
I would like a definitive answer to this question...

I'm afraid I can't direct you to one.

But I do recall the issue coming up in the immediate aftermath of the 2000 election. A rumor circulated that California wouldn't bother to count the absentee ballots, because they wouldn't affect the outcome (in that state).

It was soon dismissed, however, by sources who were in a position to know. Among them was Bill Jones, the Secretary of State and chief election official in California. Jones is a Republican.

Evidently it is standard practice for all ballots to be counted, even if they will not affect the outcome. The records require an accurate final total (for planning the next election, e.g.).

22 posted on 10/28/2004 11:53:20 PM PDT by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: okie01

If the allegation is true, it nukes Democrats...If it is false it nukes the author.


23 posted on 10/28/2004 11:56:38 PM PDT by Outraged
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: JanetteS

BUMP for later reading


24 posted on 10/29/2004 12:15:11 AM PDT by rennatdm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JanetteS

Janette? You want to write for my magazine as a guest columnist? Send me 750 words or so (preferably no more than that), stay on point, and I'll consider it for publication.

If you need my e-mail address, let me know and I'll send it to you privately.

25 posted on 10/29/2004 1:07:41 AM PDT by MrBallroom (Help, I'm talking and I can't shut up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: okie01

I had never heard either way; if California had counted them; good.

The fact is, it does not eliminate the requirement for uniform balloting laws in all 50 states. No uniformity in balloting laws = no federal funding of any kind to the offending state. They did it with the 55 MPH speed limit in the 1970's and the 21 drinking age in the 1980's. They can and should do it again.

26 posted on 10/29/2004 1:10:22 AM PDT by MrBallroom (Help, I'm talking and I can't shut up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: dsc

Yep. It is True. Every time someone has said to me that Gore won the popular vote, I have challenged them-How can you say that when so many ballots were not counted in Kalifornia and New York etc.?

Don't recall exactly, but pretty sure it was on one of our threads back then.


27 posted on 10/29/2004 1:17:27 AM PDT by greeneyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson