Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rocklobster11

Here is the article - you can link to the video on the top.

http://kstp.com/article/stories/S3741.html?cat=1

The rebuttal to this scam needs to be made very simple:

One, the location has not been verified, as they have just said it is south of Al-QaQaa.
Two, the news crew said they did not enter a bunker that had been sealed by the IAEA, therefore, the photos had to have been taken at a bunker that did NOT contain the explosives in question. The crew had to climb up on the side of the bunker to look through the vent to see inside, proving, they did NOT go inside any sealed bunker. Also there is no photo or video of anyone breaking an IAEA seal.
Third, if these explosives were so dangerous, why did the IAEA not destroy them in 1995 when they were told to do so?
Fourth, it needs to be STRESSED that the IAEA left these explosives in the hands of Saddam Hussein.
Fifth, the amount of explosives is not near as high as first stated.
Sixth, Iraq WAS an ammunition dump and a very dangerous place.

Bush has handled this just right, as he has called for an investigation and should keep hammering Kerry for jumping to conclusions too quickly and blaming the troops, and he should keep talking about how many thousands of tons of ammunition the military has already destroyed. He should finally acknowledge that he is grateful that Kerry finally realizes how dangerous Iraq really was. Also, he should point out that the IAEA should have destoyed these explosives, as they were required to do according to Charles Krauthammer.


31 posted on 10/28/2004 11:40:49 PM PDT by Texas Deb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: Texas Deb
"Also, he should point out that the IAEA should have destoyed these explosives, as they were required to do according to Charles Krauthammer."

Yeah, but the IAEA isn't the Republican candidate, so nobody reporting the news in the MSM will pass that word along. This whole thing is insane anyway and it won't work. IMHO swing voters are seeing through this and it's going to work in Bush's favor.

33 posted on 10/29/2004 12:39:15 AM PDT by GraceofGod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson