Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

John & Ken charged with McCain-Feingold violation?
John & Ken KFI 640 AM ^ | 10/28/04 | John & Ken Show

Posted on 10/28/2004 6:59:39 PM PDT by lonewacko_dot_com

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-129 last
To: Wolfstar
I think what they are doing does more harm than good.

FReepers of good will can agree to disagree.

If they (John and Ken) were not connecting with the public in some way they would have lost their audience a long time ago. The fact that they have helped to organize large groups to actively hold the politicos feet to the fire means that they have hit a nerve.

No one is asking you to jump on any band wagon. If you love Drieir and what he has done about the illegals, than good for you. The rest of us (especially those of us in Mexifornia) see the result of his tenure in office in our illegals-occupied schools, illegals-bled closing hospitals, and illegals-packed prisons.

121 posted on 11/01/2004 9:41:53 AM PST by Nachum (Kerry spells "Fine Dining")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
FReepers of good will can agree to disagree.

Yes, they can and frequently do. The problem is people who are not of good will.

If you love Drier...

You see, that's the issue. I have made it clear over and over again that my problem is with J&K and their stunt. To me, this is not about Drier, or illegals, or any political issue. It is about a pair of radio jocks who, in my opinion, are doing more harm than good. I am capable of separating the issue from these two opportunists who happen to be flogging it at the moment.

You are right -- FReepers of good will are likely to understand my point and not hurl hysterical, stupid insults my way. They will not rage and rant whenever anyone takes a position that even slightly diverges from their own. They will not feel the need to defend J&K, and would not confuse someone's dislike of those two bozos with where that person stands on illegal immigration. Got it?!

122 posted on 11/01/2004 10:03:07 AM PST by Wolfstar (America's enemies, both here and overseas, just love John Kerry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: Wolfstar
I have made it clear over and over again that my problem is with J&K and their stunt.

That's fine, you have a problem with them. I and numerous others here do not. Nothing else has worked and finally we are getting some response. If you can think of a way to get Asa Hutchinson to come out two times to California to talk about illegals, I'm all ears. This was the first time in 4 years. If you find another way to get Drieir to actually posit some meaningful legislation about illegals, let's hear it. Up till now, he not only ignored us, he bragged about it. I'm up for any suggestion that you have. Let's hear it.

Got it?

123 posted on 11/01/2004 10:10:37 AM PST by Nachum (Kerry spells "Fine Dining")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

And you tried to pass yourself off as someone of good will.


124 posted on 11/01/2004 10:15:56 AM PST by Wolfstar (America's enemies, both here and overseas, just love John Kerry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: John Lenin
Did you sleep through prop 187 ? Who was governor when the Supreme Court appeal was ignored ?

Nope. Though apparently you have no idea of what actually happened to Prop 187.

But being the generous and helpful soul that I am, I'll help alleviate your profound ignorance.

Prop 187 was never reviewed by the Supreme Court. It was never even reviewed by the Ninth Circuit Court. Federal Judge Marianne Pfaelzer sat on the Proposition until Pete Wilson's term expired. She then declared the Prop unConstitutional. Gov Gray Davis, not wanting the Proposition to get reviewed, did not challenge Judge Pfaelzer's ruling. Thus the Propostion was struck down by one judge, with the cooperation of Gray Davis.

So, I give up- "who was Governor when the Supreme Court appeal was ignored"? Only those of you in the parallel universe where there was such an appeal know the answer.

125 posted on 11/01/2004 7:53:57 PM PST by Pelham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: Wolfstar

Wow, I always wondered who was in charge of measuring goodwill.

I'm curious- was it "a stunt" when J&K used their show to push Gray Davis' recall? Was it a stunt when they rallied voters behind Arnold? Or is it only a stunt when they oppose the darling of the Log Cabin Club?


126 posted on 11/01/2004 7:59:07 PM PST by Pelham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: Pelham
Gray Davis, not wanting the Proposition to get reviewed, did not challenge Judge Pfaelzer's ruling.

Thanks for inserting your own foot in your own mouth.
127 posted on 11/01/2004 8:13:43 PM PST by John Lenin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: John Lenin

Nice try, but you need to learn the facts of the case before you try employing attitude.

Pzaelzer and Davis short-circuited the appeals process by reaching a mediated agreement. Ergo Prop 187 was never reviewed by the Supreme Court, as you sought to inform us. Nor a Federal Appeals Court, nor anyone higher than Pzaelzer herself. Feel free to try again to salvage your belief that 187 was ruled on by the Supremes.


128 posted on 11/01/2004 8:26:59 PM PST by Pelham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: Pelham
Funny you should mention the recall. I was opposed to the recall. I made a decision as to how to vote only after it made the ballot and the various candidates put themselves forward. Personally, I still think the recall was a mistake, and I don't think Arnold is doing a good job.

As for J&K, had listened to them for a long time, since they first came on the air in L.A. in the early '90's. I gave up listening to them at least four years ago, because I can't stand them -- especially John, whose immature cackling laugh, short fuse, and stupid stunts just grate on me. I don't like them. I don't like anything about them. End of discussion.

129 posted on 11/02/2004 8:11:28 AM PST by Wolfstar (Tomorrow the United States of America hangs in the balance. Vote accordingly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-129 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson