[tpaine]

RayStacy wrote:

Also, I wish you WOULD ignore me. Twice before you said you were done with me

______________________________________


In your first post this morning, to Ken, you sounded like you had regained your rationality: ---

______________________________________


The USSC has already said that the First and Fourth Amendments apply to the States.
Are you in favor of USSC incorporating the Second?
357 Ken H



Absolutely and positively.
Nothing could be more corrupt than the SC picking and choosing which parts of the BOR it wants to incorporate.
360 RayStacy

______________________________________


--- So I replied, elaborating on what I thought might be a commonality, the irrational behavior of the court on "incorporation" of our BOR's.

I was wrong. You are just as irrational on the subject as the court.

[RayStacy]

What now? I agree -- if the court is going to come up with some bizarre way to apply part x and part y and z of the BOR to the states, then they damn well better apply the whole thing. That, however, is NOT what you have been discussing with me. You have continued to say that the BOR has always applied to the states and that is what was intended. Both of which are false. As I stated earlier -- because the CONS has been utterly destroyed by both the Congress and the SC since at least 1937, and is now completely dead, I favor gun rights by ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER PERIOD NO HOLDS BARRED AT ALL. I don't care if the SC says we all get guns because the Monroe doctrine as described by Jeffersonian agrarians and promulgated by the Amphicitionic Confederacy dictates it. I WANT MY GUNS!! AND I DON'T CARE HOW I GET THEM. I will not, however, pretend that the BOR dictates it. Now does that convince you that I love guns? Or am I still just a faker?