Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mrsmith
"You already know that the Bill Of Rights granted no new powers to the federal government but further restriced the use what powers it had. No doubt you'll recall that Madison again tried to give the federal government that power to protect some rights from the states in the Bill of Rights, but again it was rejected by congress.

I suppose that is why we have a SCOTUS. It would be nice if it was consistent though. Rejected the gun cases and accepted Roe and possibly others.

My interest is just the gun issue. Upon the outcome of that, rests the value of the Constitution itself.

317 posted on 11/10/2004 2:24:51 PM PST by Eastbound ("Neither a Scrooge nor a Patsy be")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 315 | View Replies ]


To: Eastbound
Yeah power is the root of all societies, an unarmed citizenry is as rootless as the dust.

I must say that these constant attempts by Freepers for a federal protection of rights- much though it irritates me LOL!- is just what Madison did. It's a shame it wasn't accomplished until the 14th Amendment, but it just wasn't possible until the federal government had proved itself to the people and enough states were willing to combine to destroy slavery.

To a great extent the 14th Amendment brought Madison's original constitutional scheme to completion by giving the feds a power to protect people from their states.

320 posted on 11/10/2004 2:48:45 PM PST by mrsmith ("Oyez, oyez! All rise for the Honorable Chief Justice.. NOT Hillary Rodham Clinton ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 317 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson