Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tpaine
"I'm not saying that States can violate it."

Hey, weasel. What are you saying?

Are you saying that Article I, Section 9 is also binding on the states by the Supremacy Clause?

213 posted on 10/30/2004 10:30:39 AM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies ]


To: robertpaulsen
Section 9 is specific to Congress
tpaine

______________________________________


How can you say that? Section 9 is part of the "supreme law of the land" from Article VI that you constantly point out - "anything in the laws or constitutions of the states to the contrary notwithstanding". How can you say that states can violate it?
200 inquest

______________________________________


I'm not saying that States can violate it.
202 tpaine

______________________________________


What are you saying?
Are you saying that Article I, Section 9 is also binding on the states by the Supremacy Clause?

______________________________________


Always was. All of the Constitution & its Amendments are the "Law of the Land".

[given that the 16th should be repealed]
215 posted on 10/30/2004 10:48:50 AM PDT by tpaine (No man has a natural right to commit aggression on the equal rights of another. - T. Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson