Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cavalier79

I assume this was written before the Pentagon showed the shots of the explosives being moved before the start of the war. If not, this writer is obviously in serious denial!!


2 posted on 10/28/2004 4:38:02 PM PDT by Primetimedonna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Primetimedonna

And de nile is not just a river in...
Cleveland?

nevermind... you had to be there.


24 posted on 10/28/2004 4:44:13 PM PDT by RUCKUS INC. (Mount St. Helens is just warming up for the impending armageddon should John Kerry win in Nov.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Primetimedonna

IAEA report mentions that there are slats for ventilation which rendered "seals" worthless because slats could be easily removed and materials removed without breaking the "seals". Seems they forgot to mention this in thier report.


27 posted on 10/28/2004 4:45:25 PM PDT by stopillegalimmigration
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Primetimedonna
... and how does anyone know what is in the barrels. Might just be good old sand put there to fool the inspectors.

I assume the reporter had his explosives ID test kit with him and will show us the results later.

My take, if there was anything in the IAEA bunkers, the bunker busters got it.

33 posted on 10/28/2004 4:49:21 PM PDT by snooker (Hate is not a plan for America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Primetimedonna

This was posted on Lucianne.com by a poster who heard the photographer on the radio this morning:

"This ABC story is very misleading. The photographer who shot the video was on a local radio station this morning and he made no such claims. In fact he had the tape sent to some weapons experts to try and verify that what was on his videotape was the stuff that has been in the press.

He also wasn't even sure he was at Al-Qaqaa, he stated that the reporter that he was with was constantly taking GPS readings and that he was also trying to find the GPS coordinates of Al-Qaqaa to match the coordinates that he and the reporter were recording.

He was very adamant that he did not know what he saw or for that matter exactly where he was and he was waiting for more information before he would be confident that the stuff he saw was indeed the controversial explosives."

http://www.kstp.com/article/stories/S3740.html?cat=1


The reporter is not even sure it was Al-QaQaa, and the date cited is April 18 - one week AFTER the time frame that has been discussed when the 101st was there (April 11)and two weeks after the 3rdID was there (April 4).

The time frame and the location then are suspect, as the IAEA has not claimed that HMX was missing from any other location, and it appears the photographer was not even sure where he was.

Debbie






70 posted on 10/28/2004 5:02:43 PM PDT by Texas Deb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Primetimedonna
I assume this was written before the Pentagon showed the shots of the explosives being moved before the start of the war. If not, this writer is obviously in serious denial!!

I assume that you have now seen the film with your own eyes and enjoyed the next 3 explanations the pentagon has given ending with pulling a poor soldier out to say he blew up some munitions, but he did not know if theses were a part of it.

This was a huge screw up by the pentagon , plain and simple.

228 posted on 10/29/2004 7:57:29 PM PDT by RnMomof7 ( ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson