Posted on 10/28/2004 1:37:19 PM PDT by fidelio
Jaimie Gorelick is a member of the board of Schlumberger.
Funny how we never hear about that.
Didn't Clinton hire Halliburton too because they were the only qualified company to do the work? Does the FBI know this? I thought everyone knew by now....
The MSM is really putting themselves on the edge of the cliff for the Kerry campaign. The Bush victory is going to be even sweeter knowing that the MSM destroyed itself trying to get Kerry to the White House.
![]() |
Search - Finance Home - Yahoo! - Help |
![]() |
Insider & Form 144 Filings - GORELICK, JAMIE S |
|
28-Oct-04 |
Enter symbol: symbol lookup |
|
EDGAR Online: Get a Free Trial to EDGAR Online Premium | Full text Search
|
Insider & restricted shareholder transactions reported over the last two years | |||||
Date | Shares | Stock | Transaction |
|
Thanks!
Gorelick has served on the Schlumberger Board of Directors since 2002.
aw Jeez not this $h!T again
Moose, I think you are right. I've also been wondering if there might be a back door attack through Cheney with some 'new' revelation about Halliburton, that evil empire. All they need is a 1-2% swing or a similar reduction in turnout. On the other hand, what type of revelation about Kerry would dissuade his base from coming out? Let's see - they are pacifists, yet give him a wink about his war hero status. He is filthy rich because of his use of women, yet he gets a pass from the feminists. They are animal rights activists, yet he kills a goose. The worst thing that could be leaked about him to suppress his base would be??? Turnout is key, of course. A_R
A_R
I listened to the woman's lawyer om Hardball earlier and he said her concern was it was not out to bid on for minority companies. She oversees that business is fair to minority companies.
I would like her to tell us exactly what minority companies were in a position to contract that kind of services to Iraq immmediately. Why didn't she complain when Bill Clinton awarded Halliburton a no bid contract?!
P O L I T I C S
Uh, no, I doubt they are. The FBI would turn any evidence of crime by high administration officials to the Justice Department and then run very far away from the investigation as fast as they could until/unless some kind of special prosecutor was appointed.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.