Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GeorgeW23225; Coop; Corin Stormhands; Gabz; Flora McDonald
"She lost by 100,000 votes."

OUCH!! Was it that bad? I just heard she lost and never really checked out the numbers very closely. What was the final tally? I can't believe Scott is really all that popular.

"Sorry, but even with a great candidate, we can not overcome that margin. This is more than "getting out in front of a few more voters". The 3rd Congressional lines need to be re-drawn."

So what's a good solid candidate like Ms. Sears supposed to do until 2010 or 2012? Is there a spot fer her in the Kilgore Administration?

FReegards...MUD

263 posted on 11/09/2004 10:22:59 PM PST by Mudboy Slim (Hey Rudy G., RE-IMPEACH the HildaBeast's Hubby!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 261 | View Replies ]


To: Mudboy Slim

Sit down. Here is the BAD news.

Scott: 156,217 votes 69%

Sears: 68,619 votes 31%

I find it hard to believe that there are this many idiots in one Congressional District, but, the numbers don't lie.

Jerry Kilgore simply must find a place for Winsome in his cabinet. That way, she can stay front and center, and then take on Scott again in the future. However, if this district was purposely drawn to keep all of the "stupid vote" in one area, it certainly has been succesful. I just don't see any hope for the 3rd district as far as the eye can see.......


282 posted on 11/10/2004 9:15:15 AM PST by GeorgeW23225 (Liberals really aren*t bad people. It*s just that they know so much that simply ISN*T true!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 263 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson