Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Blogger grounded by her airline
BBC News ^ | 27th February 2004 | Jo Twist

Posted on 10/28/2004 3:39:56 AM PDT by ozguy

A US airline attendant is fighting for her job after she was suspended over postings on her blog, or online diary. Queen of the Sky, otherwise known as Ellen Simonetti, evolved into an anonymous semi-fictional account of life in the sky.

But after she posted pictures of herself in uniform, Delta Airlines suspended her indefinitely without pay.

Ms Simonetti was told her suspension was a result of "inappropriate" images. Delta Airlines declined to comment

(Excerpt) Read more at news.bbc.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: dal
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last
To: sweetliberty
Now that is a serious infringement of her personal rights.

I don't agree. Nobody has the "right" to work for a particular employer. She can always try to find an employer willing to let her keep her blog.

That would be like one of us getting fired because a coworker happened to see what some of us post on Free Republic.

The analogy is flawed. She posed for a cheesecake photo in what her employer considered to be an inappropriate way while wearing her employer's uniform. That's a call they get to make, and they made it. If my employer suddenly made the call that posting on FreeRepublic was cause for termination, I would be out the door the next day and would go to work for somebody else.

I'll shed no tears for her today. Let her find another job.

21 posted on 10/28/2004 5:01:38 AM PDT by asgardshill (Got a lump of coal? Tell Mary Mapes to 'shove it' - in 2 weeks you'll have a diamond.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: asgardshill

She better capitalize on those gams (and whatever else). She's not much in the face department, IMO. Should have kept her day job.


22 posted on 10/28/2004 5:06:44 AM PDT by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Revelation 911

Who's the tomato?


23 posted on 10/28/2004 5:15:49 AM PDT by Piranha
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: sweetliberty

I haven't been to her site, nor do I intend to go. So I will continue the fine FR tradition of posting bloviations when I have no idea what I am talking about. If her site is like most employment related sites I have seen it is a mix of salacious "true stories" about sexual exploits with a healthy dose of "my boss is an idiot". Add it general criticism of airline procedures and safety, and you have a website people will visit and run up the counter.

But I could see why that would give Delta an itchy finger on the firing hand. Posting her picture in a Delta aircraft in a Delta uniform gave them the cause.


24 posted on 10/28/2004 5:16:20 AM PDT by gridlock (BARKEEP: Why the long face? HORSE: Ha ha, old joke. BARKEEP: Not you, I was talking to JF'n Kerry!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: sweetliberty
That would be like one of us getting fired because a coworker happened to see what some of us post on Free Republic.

No it wouldn't.

25 posted on 10/28/2004 5:17:48 AM PDT by PBRSTREETGANG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Piranha

That dame got me off the ground faster than a lightly loaded 727 on a short runway. She had the kind of legs that made a guy want to sit on the aisle seat...


26 posted on 10/28/2004 5:18:51 AM PDT by gridlock (BARKEEP: Why the long face? HORSE: Ha ha, old joke. BARKEEP: Not you, I was talking to JF'n Kerry!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: asgardshill
"Nobody has the "right" to work for a particular employer.

I agree with that, but once someone IS employed by a company, they shouldn't have to worry about losing their job because of what they do on their OWN personal time. Unless there was something specifically addressing something like this as cause for termination or it was something in her contract with the company, then at most, she should get a warning, and if that isn't the real reason they fired her, then somebody needs to have the guts to tell her what the real reason is.

"She posed for a cheesecake photo in what her employer considered to be an inappropriate way while wearing her employer's uniform."

Not all people automatically know what an employer might consider inappropriate. If she was not given a given a warning, her termination is at the very least, unfair.

27 posted on 10/28/2004 5:34:21 AM PDT by sweetliberty (Proud member of the Pajama Posse!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: ozguy
Needs lesson in not using other peoples property for your gain.

Typical of a dim.
28 posted on 10/28/2004 5:36:02 AM PDT by snooker (Hate is not a plan for America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PBRSTREETGANG
"That would be like one of us getting fired because a coworker happened to see what some of us post on Free Republic."

And tell me how it's different. If someone I work with happened to look at FR to see what kind of stuff I posted, they might discover not only that I support certain political candidates, but what I think of some our departmental procedures and even, by inference, some of them. Are you saying that would give them the right to to file a grievance with my employer to have me terminated. Where the h*ll is my right to a life apart from my job? And again I ask, what would be the difference? The only difference I see is that here there are more people voicing their opinions, and on a blog there is basically just one.

29 posted on 10/28/2004 5:41:13 AM PDT by sweetliberty (Proud member of the Pajama Posse!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: sweetliberty
I agree with that, but once someone IS employed by a company, they shouldn't have to worry about losing their job because of what they do on their OWN personal time.

It sure looks like she was on the clock when the cheesecake photo in question was taken. Unless she built a full mockup on her own dime of the passenger compartment of an aircraft at her home (which is unlikely), she was wearing the employer's uniform and presumably aboard one of the company's aircraft.

Last time I checked, Texas (her putative place of employment) is an "at-will" employment state. Except for very narrowly-defined criteria such as racial discrimination, an employer can let you go for cause, because they're having trouble meeting payroll, or because you wore brown pants to work on a particular day. There simply is no "right" to employment.

30 posted on 10/28/2004 5:51:08 AM PDT by asgardshill (Got a lump of coal? Tell Mary Mapes to 'shove it' - in 2 weeks you'll have a diamond.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: sweetliberty
I suspect that this was a matter if her having embarassed someone by something she wrote, even if she didn't use real names. Posting her picture was a dumb move, but she shouldn't be fired for it.

Take a look at your employee handbook. 99.9% of all companies have a clause for detrimental behavior. Positive Delta has one. No Excuses! Bye Bye!

31 posted on 10/28/2004 5:53:33 AM PDT by Allosaurs_r_us (Carnivores for Conservatives!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: asgardshill

One small problem. AIA requires the Flight Attendants to purchase their uniforms (looking for confirmation). If this is true, then they CANNOT punish her for wearing it.

She was not speaking on behalf of her employer.

AIA may be in the wrong here...

[I]"She can always try to find an employer willing to let her keep her blog."[/I]

Is it your position that an employer can control her, or any employees non-work activities that do not violate law or federal regulation?


32 posted on 10/28/2004 6:00:26 AM PDT by ace2u_in_MD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: ace2u_in_MD
One small problem. AIA requires the Flight Attendants to purchase their uniforms (looking for confirmation). If this is true, then they CANNOT punish her for wearing it.

"AIA"? I thought she worked for Delta Airlines. (But I could be mistaken).

She was not speaking on behalf of her employer.

No argument here.

AIA may be in the wrong here...

AIA (or Delta) may be. I guess we'll find out, depending on how lawyered up she gets.

Is it your position that an employer can control her, or any employees non-work activities that do not violate law or federal regulation?

There's a boilerplate "morals clause" in 99.99 percent of the employee handbooks out there. I don't think that an employer can "control her", but I also don't think that anybody has a "right" to a job. And if that photograph was taken while she was on the clock aboard a company asset, she's toast in my opinion.

33 posted on 10/28/2004 6:06:27 AM PDT by asgardshill (Got a lump of coal? Tell Mary Mapes to 'shove it' - in 2 weeks you'll have a diamond.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: sweetliberty
And tell me how it's different.

Did I miss your avatar where you are in uniform on company property, or standing at your place of business smiling and waving under the corporate logo?

If I wrote "semi-fictional" stories about my workplace on Free Republic and then identified my workplace to the general public, I would fully expect my employer to fire me if they found out.

34 posted on 10/28/2004 6:06:55 AM PDT by PBRSTREETGANG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: sweetliberty

There is language in all airlines governing behavior while in uniform and she knew damn well that cheesecake pose in uniform would be cause for termination. No industry has more stringent guidelines for behavior on/off duty than the airlines.


35 posted on 10/28/2004 6:14:07 AM PDT by RVN Airplane Driver (www.RealHeroesVoices.com....see the real John Kerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson