[i]What if this intel (Russia/Iraqi weapons) was classified, and Kerry used them, knowing that Bush wouldn't or couldn't respond?[/i]
Given the stunned reaction of Bush, I'd say you're right on the money. Kerry was letting state secrets fly, on television, with the whole nation watching.
And even more hand wringing from the steaming dung heap known as DU.
Wed Oct-27-04 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
8. Oh, please.
Edited on Wed Oct-27-04 10:58 PM by ocelot
About 40 big trucks would be needed to transport 350 tons of explosives. We were spying on Iraq with satellites long before the invasion started. So how did the Russian army smuggle 40 truckloads of stuff out of Iraq and we didn't discover it? Anyhow, isn't Vladimir George's best buddy?
This is a big steaming heap of AlQaqaa. But, then, would we expect anything else from the moonie Times?
Wed Oct-27-04 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
9. Link at Wash. Times..
This whole article stinks to high heaven.. I see Drudgery put up his little flashing "lie speading" beacon, at least we all know its a crock now. This will almost certainly die or simply explode in Bushy's face. Too little, too late!
"Given the stunned reaction of Bush, I'd say you're right on the money. Kerry was letting state secrets fly, on television, with the whole nation watching."
- To prove your theory, you'd have to go back to the tapes of the first debate and see what was the subject under discussion at the time and what Kerry then said which appeared to upset and piss off Bush. If it was something on the weapons topic, Kerry is doomed.
Well, he may have been letting veiled references to intel fly, at the very least. Looking back over the past few years, it wouldn't be the first time the Dems used the tactic. Think uranium from Niger, the SOTU address and British intel.