Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Westpole
Excellent article, and spot-on in many ways.

Of course, the WOT is different in several crucial respects to the Civil War. For one thing, the Confederacy was engaged in what it's proponents saw as a Second American Revolution and wanted to be left alone; the Islamo-fascists are interested in imposing their despicable ideology on the world, and killing anyone who refuses to comply. Also, the Confederate soldier, as a rule, was brave in battle and honorable in conduct; there is absolutely nothing honorable or brave about the little cowards who make up the ranks of Al Quaeda.

But, overall, and as concerns the domestic political situation, I agree: 1864 and 2004 are eerily similar.
7 posted on 10/27/2004 7:20:44 PM PDT by A Jovial Cad ("I had no shoes and I complained, until I saw a man who had no feet.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: A Jovial Cad

The 1864 election was a "men voters only" affair. That is an enormous difference.


10 posted on 10/27/2004 7:31:27 PM PDT by Ranald S. MacKenzie (Its the philosophy, stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson