Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Peach

THE INTERESTING PART of this whole thing is that Kerry keeps talking about this "dangerous nuclear material", and that Bush lost it...and before he said "there were no weapons of mass destruction"". I guess nuclear material doesn't qualify?

IT SEEMS TO HAVE BACKFIRED ON KERRY'S CAMPAIGN...make an issue out of this, and we can prove it wasn't on óur watch...the war hadn't started, but yet it proves there were weapons of mass destruction material in Iraq...lots of it. Too funny.

Kerry can't have it both ways...LOL


492 posted on 10/27/2004 7:27:11 PM PDT by Kackikat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies ]


To: Kackikat
Good thing the DEMOCRATS didn't complain about the 500 tons of URANIUM we found in IRAQ.

Which they direly needed back then, as they had no natural resources to depend on for energy, like.....oil......

503 posted on 10/27/2004 7:46:23 PM PDT by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 492 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson