Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Don't laugh - this is US democracy at work (Electoral College beyond the grasp of idiot Scotsman)
The Scotsman ^ | 10/27/04 | FRASER NELSON

Posted on 10/27/2004 8:26:02 AM PDT by dead

DEMOCRACY Plaza is a quintessentially American event: an open-air museum laid on for two weeks in New York where people flock to see film stars and sporting heroes gushing patriotically about the great American vote.

And this from a country which next week is likely to lay on the most farcical display of democracy in the free world. There will be lawyers at the ballot booths, hanging chads and lawyers suing for victory as the rest of the planet howls with laughter.

It is likely to be just as bad, if not worse than last time - when George W Bush won by 537 votes in Florida and was saved after a Supreme Court ruled 5-4 against a recount. This is the US Electoral College system, which is about to work its chaotic magic again.

The fiasco has started already. Both sides have 20,000 lawyers stationed with jets within an hour of any polling stations in swing states - watching for voter fraud, dirty tricks or any means they can dream up to deny their rivals a few thousand votes.

And there are dirty tricks aplenty. Four counties in Ohio - the main battleground state - have more registered voters than there are voting-age residents. So far, 120,000 duplicate names have been found on the state’s electoral roll.

Many of the single names are, to say the least, suspect. One is a murder victim, two are suspected terrorists and scores moved out of Ohio years ago. The race for voter registration, it seems, has been carried out with a little too much vigour.

But this is the result of desperation because, rarely, every vote counts. New Mexico was decided (for the Democrats) by 366 people last time - and the entire presidency was decided by that 537 margin in Florida (population: 12.9 million).

To put this into perspective, Malcolm Chisholm, Scotland’s hapless former health minister, was elected with a 5,010 majority last year in his corner of Edinburgh. The average MSP was returned by a majority far larger than that which took Mr Bush to the White House.

This is why American democracy seems so hilariously inept. A country of 300 million could have had its presidency decided by the number of people it takes to fill the Horseshoe Bar in Glasgow. This is the Electoral College in action.

Four years ago, America clearly decided. Al Gore, the Democrat candidate, had a majority of some half a million votes - but this was flattened by an Electoral College whose mechanisms are not fully understood by the voters themselves.

Next Tuesday, Americans will not be voting for a president directly, but for a class of "electors" who will vote for a president next month. Such people compose the Electoral College, and are asked (though not obliged) to cast their votes for whoever their state chooses.

Reeking of Westminster-style antiquity, it was written by the Founding Fathers so deep into the US constitution that 700 separate attempts have failed to get it out.

The first problem is that the winner takes all in almost all states. Sprawling California sends back 55 college members, all of whom voted Democrat last time. California’s five million Republican voters may as well have stayed at home.

Even if the Electoral College votes were shared out, it would still have been imprecise enough to deliver victory for Mr Bush last time, on a (narrow) minority of votes. The only fair method is to abolish the idea of state-voting, and have a straight election.

And America knows this. Successive opinion polls have called for the abolition of the Electoral College. But changing the US constitution needs approval of swing states, who do not want to lose the year-round attention they enjoy from whoever is in the White House.

This could have made for a good exhibit in Manhattan’s Democracy Plaza: a defect corner, showing flaws in democracy and the casualties it inflicts. Swing states and swing voters get attention: dependable voters in safe seats are hung out to dry.

The most powerful country in the world, the United States, can become a global laughing stock because it can’t decide which of two people to have for president. And this is a country intent on exporting democracy to the world.

But before Britain tut-tuts, we should look at the plank in our own eye. At least Americans have a direct say in who runs the country: in our general election, we’ll be asked to vote for a party, not a person, knowing that Tony Blair is about to quit.

Who will be next? Gordon Brown? Alan Milburn? The British public doesn’t know - and won’t be privy to the decision. The leadership is deemed a race too important for us to worry our pretty heads about: we are asked to return a local MP, and then go back to sleep.

EVEN new systems such as the Scottish Parliament have their flaws. The proportional representation hands power to the least-popular parties (the Liberal Democrats) and is set to deliver Lib-Lab coalition for a generation.

The swing-state prejudice can be seen here. Much of Scotland’s inner cities, for example, are left to rot because they can be relied upon to produce Labour votes time and time again. Estates in a marginal constituency would get more attention.

The English countryside gets such a raw deal from Westminster because it has always voted Tory and always will. Let them protest in Parliament Square over the foxhunting ban - the constituency system will prevent their anger from infecting Labour votes.

And the Tories could safely forget about Scotland in the Eighties. Our Westminster system delivers strong government - but hands disproportionate power to suburban Britain, because it is most capable of changing its mind.

The elections being held in Afghanistan are for show - just to send a message that the system works. The country, like Iraq, is many years away from the economic stability which is the condition for meaningful democracy.

So how to judge a democracy? Not stability. Saddam Hussein in Iraq, like Robert Mugabe in Zimbabwe, held regular elections. On choice of candidates? The rainbow selection in Italy leads all to regular chaos.

Every democracy has its vice - and America’s is the Electoral College system which has returned a president against the majority wishes of its national electorate only three times. But it’s still three times too many - and, next week, it may become four.

As things stand, Mr Bush seems to be winning the national vote, but faring less well in swing states. So this time, it may be his turn to win the majority of voters, but lose power. What’s fascinating about the American race is that, still, no-one knows.

In Europe, it’s fashionable to assume that Mr Bush will win again, because there is a grimly fatalistic ring to this election and incumbents tend to win a second term. But this view is not repeated by any serious American political analyst.

The better people know the Electoral College system and its ability to spread chaos, the more they laugh in the face of anyone who taps their nose and mutters wise predictions about the way the political wind is blowing.

So while we laugh from across the Atlantic at the unseemly vote-counting farce likely to erupt in Ohio, Florida and Wisconsin, we may also envy a system where the scales of power are genuinely capable of being tipped.

The US presidential election will be ugly, messy and - above all - thoroughly entertaining. But at least Americans have a plausible opposition and a real chance of changing their government. Many in Britain would give their eye-teeth for either.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-109 next last

1 posted on 10/27/2004 8:26:02 AM PDT by dead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: dead
And this from a country which next week is likely to lay on the most farcical display of democracy in the free world. There will be lawyers at the ballot booths, hanging chads and lawyers suing for victory as the rest of the planet howls with laughter.

And no one will be murdered at the polls. There won't be 100,000's of people rioting in the streets. There won't be 10,000's of troops called out with tanks to control the population.

Go ahead and laugh.

2 posted on 10/27/2004 8:28:26 AM PDT by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dead

And Scotland has contributed to the world in what again? Oh yeah Ewan MacGregor, who likes to get naked and dance around in all his movies. I'll take that from Scotland, but the rest of them can Shut the hell up. Thank-you.


3 posted on 10/27/2004 8:29:17 AM PDT by Wonderama ("America is a vast conspiracy to make you happy"....John Updike)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dead

Actually an entertaining, if ignorant, analysis.


4 posted on 10/27/2004 8:30:50 AM PDT by RockinRight (Bush's rallies look like World Series games. Kerry's rallies look like Little League games.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wonderama
Oh, you forgot Trainspotting, the movie that gave the world Heroin Chic. Now there's a contribution to the betterment of mankind. Right up there w/ haggis.
5 posted on 10/27/2004 8:30:50 AM PDT by .cnI redruM ("Two Kerrys for the two Americas.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dead

Europeans who proclaim they know America don't know jack.


6 posted on 10/27/2004 8:31:11 AM PDT by OpusatFR (Let me repeat this: the web means never having to swill leftist garbage again. Got it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dead

How long has Scotland been England's bitch now?


7 posted on 10/27/2004 8:31:41 AM PDT by johniegrad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: <1/1,000,000th%

Maybe we should read all the way to the last sentence?


8 posted on 10/27/2004 8:31:49 AM PDT by proxy_user
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dead
And yet, if Kerry wins, yon wee laddie will marvel at the sterling character of American democracy, that bright and shining star to the world's oppressed masses...
9 posted on 10/27/2004 8:32:17 AM PDT by atomicpossum (If there are two Americas, John Edwards isn't qualified to lead either of them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dead
The simple answer is: It is a REPUBLIC not a Democracy!
10 posted on 10/27/2004 8:32:53 AM PDT by taxcontrol (People are entitled to their opinion - no matter how wrong it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johniegrad

500 years, or so.


11 posted on 10/27/2004 8:33:03 AM PDT by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Wonderama

12 posted on 10/27/2004 8:33:29 AM PDT by TheBigB (Please Lord...let Bush win and I promise...no naughty thoughts about Lindsay Lohan for a week.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dead

Is this idiot for or against the electoral college? He makes no sense.


13 posted on 10/27/2004 8:33:37 AM PDT by oldleft
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dead

Hey! Shaddap and go back to your distillery.


14 posted on 10/27/2004 8:33:40 AM PDT by ArrogantBustard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: proxy_user

That little sop of a last sentence (basically saying how lucky Americans are that they have even a chance to kick out a demonic moron like Bush) hardly redeems this comically ignorant attack.


15 posted on 10/27/2004 8:34:47 AM PDT by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: dead
"...the US constitution needs approval of swing states, who do not want to lose the year-round attention they enjoy from whoever is in the White House."

yeah. get it you limey moron?

16 posted on 10/27/2004 8:35:09 AM PDT by Pietro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: proxy_user

"The US presidential election will be ugly, messy and - above all - thoroughly entertaining. But at least Americans have a plausible opposition and a real chance of changing their government. Many in Britain would give their eye-teeth for either."


He actually seems to have a pretty fair grasp on the "why". Plus he seems to be offering an endorsement of our system.


17 posted on 10/27/2004 8:35:25 AM PDT by cripplecreek (We've turned the corner and we're not smokin crack.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: dead

I would say he wants to give Tony Blair the boot...but in favor of whom? The Tories? UKIP?


18 posted on 10/27/2004 8:36:15 AM PDT by proxy_user
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: dead
Don't laugh - this is US democracy at work

His ignorance is shown in the headline. The author is unable to grasp the simple fact that the U.S. is a Republic, not a "democracy".


"Democracy" is the most dangerous term in the American political lexicon. It has become a vague, warm-and-fuzzy label used to evoke the whole American system of government. Yet when America's Founders overthrew tyranny in this country, they emphatically rejected the notion of replacing it with another form of tyranny. For this reason, they expressly rejected democracy.

"Democracy," they recognized, actually means unlimited majority rule. If two men on a desert island vote to cannibalize the third, that is democracy. So it was when citizens of Athens, history's first democracy, voted to execute Socrates. And so it was when the German public voted for the Nazi Party. Democracy is not a system of liberty, but a form of tyranny: the tyranny of the majority.

Our Founders called the American system a "republic": a representative government limited by a constitution that protects the rights of the individual. Although the citizens of a republic vote for their leaders, voting is just a means to the end of protecting liberty. No matter what the people may wish their government to do, the Constitution is clear: Congress may pass no law that violates the rights of the individual. Such restrictions are codified in the Bill of Rights, the wall that protects our liberty from the whims of the majority.

Liberty, Not Democracy, in Iraq
(The Ayn Rand Institute)

19 posted on 10/27/2004 8:36:55 AM PDT by holymoly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: proxy_user

Don't be grumpy.

Bush will win in a landslide. ;)


20 posted on 10/27/2004 8:38:31 AM PDT by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-109 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson