Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: concretebob
hmmmm. if memory serves, we were bogged down in the freaking security council trying to beg the damn french to sign off on some sort of resolution that wasn't an absolute sell out.

so much for "rush to war". if kerry wants to criticize bush for the missing explosives, he has no one to blame but himself; if the president wasn't bending over backwards trying to make the multilateralists in the congress happy, we'd have caught saddam flat footed with this stuff, and who knows what else.

9 posted on 10/26/2004 7:56:32 PM PDT by smonk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: smonk

Seems to me that if they could move this stuff, they could also move WMD's.


16 posted on 10/26/2004 8:03:53 PM PDT by basil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: smonk
Bingo! I hate this notion of a "Rush to War." A year of giving the UN opportunity to impede a timely destruction of Saddam's regime haunts us to this day. Was the IAEA even allowed in to Iraq prior to GWB putting 150K US soldiers on the border? Our troops would still be out in the desert fighting scorpions and scraping sand out of their Abram tanks if the UN had its way. Arch nemesis France probably donated the trucks to Saddam to move the explosives and WMD's to Syria.
17 posted on 10/26/2004 8:05:05 PM PDT by Shqipo (The gloves are on and the corners are empty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson