Skip to comments.
Scientists zero in on why time flows in one direction
eurekalert/University of Chicago ^
| 26-Oct-2004
| Steve Koppes
Posted on 10/26/2004 7:36:36 PM PDT by ckilmer
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180, 181-200, 201-220 ... 281-299 next last
To: Fester Chugabrew
Time is a construct. The Master of the Universe is the Superset, Time is a Subset. The Master of the Universe is beyond time.
181
posted on
10/26/2004 9:24:37 PM PDT
by
Bandaneira
(The Third Temple/House for All Nations/World Peace Centre...Coming Soon...)
To: right way right
182
posted on
10/26/2004 9:28:38 PM PDT
by
Doctor Stochastic
(Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
To: Cogadh na Sith
But if it can be violated, it is not an absolute.Wow, ya think?
To: xzins; timestax; betty boop; P-Marlowe
Thank y'all for the pings, xzins and timestax! My first reaction is that their solution is only considers high energy particle physics and not geometric physics.
Even one extra temporal dimension eliminates physical causality in our four dimension block (3 spatial, 1 temporal).
To: Doctor Stochastic
You suck. I spit beer on my monitor.
185
posted on
10/26/2004 9:30:21 PM PDT
by
Cogadh na Sith
(--Scots Gaelic: 'War or Peace'--)
To: bentfeather; January24th
Oh did I tell you, I am caught in a time warp?Yes, Dear. I know that.
You had a 20th Century surge to be respected. Probably affected the charts of noted scientists and fashionable reconteurs world wide!
I know you had a habit of good hats. I've always guessed red and purple, but that's just me.
To: Bandaneira
The Master of the Universe That was my favorite cartoon!
187
posted on
10/26/2004 9:31:45 PM PDT
by
Cogadh na Sith
(--Scots Gaelic: 'War or Peace'--)
To: Age of Reason
Then they aren't looking small enough.The asymmetry is real. If it "comes from" something smaller, that smaller thing must encompass at least that asymmetry.
To: right way right
Anyone know what the opposite of time is?
I can offer this: the absence of time is null. IOW, without time, there is no space, ergo no matter, energy, etc.
To: Cogadh na Sith
So you did emit beer orally. (Aren't science threads wonderful?)
190
posted on
10/26/2004 9:34:39 PM PDT
by
Doctor Stochastic
(Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
To: Doctor Stochastic
Auuughhhh!
Better than the opposite of orally. (I don't mean yllaro, either)
191
posted on
10/26/2004 9:36:28 PM PDT
by
Cogadh na Sith
(--Scots Gaelic: 'War or Peace'--)
To: ckilmer
192
posted on
10/26/2004 9:37:22 PM PDT
by
Captain Beyond
(The Hammer of the gods! (Just a cool line from a Led Zep song))
To: Alamo-Girl
Did time exist before the Big Bang ? if not, how then the Big Bang ?
193
posted on
10/26/2004 9:39:51 PM PDT
by
CheezyChesster
(Patiently waiting Kerry's Big Bang Bust !)
To: Doctor Stochastic
Lordy. I leave for a little while (I think) and it's still going. :)
The whole idea that things only exist if we observe them...kinda related to Schrodinger, I think...intrigues me. Reminds me of the boy in MYSTERY MEN who could make himself invisible...but only when no one was looking at him. :)
194
posted on
10/26/2004 9:43:11 PM PDT
by
TheBigB
(Please Lord...let Bush win and I promise...no naughty thoughts about Lindsay Lohan for a week.)
To: scripter
To: TheBigB
Like looking for time in a timestax, like a needle in a haystack
To: the irate magistrate
To: CheezyChesster; betty boop; xzins; P-Marlowe
Thank you for your question!
Did time exist before the Big Bang ? if not, how then the Big Bang ?
Time cannot precede the big bang for the same reason there is no "south" of the south pole. Time is a transformation of space in relativity (Lorentz Transformation) - it is relative. Hawking proposes an alternative model for the beginning of real time by using imaginary time - basically, the need for an explanation is the loss of information in a black hole or singularity. IOW, how to explain the unreasonable effectiveness of math, the physical constants, etc. Neverthess, all cosmologies - whether big bang, imaginary time, multi-verse, ekpyrotic, cyclic, multi-worlds - all of them require a beginning. And that is the issue which invariably puts them in the domain of theology, as the Scriptures say "In the beginning, God created ..."
As Jastrow said (paraphrased) when the scientists climb that final mountain they'll be met by a bunch of theologians who have been waiting for them, for centuries.
To: ckilmer
Time can be sped up by using the mind alone. That is why when you are running you can run for an hour an it feels like 20 minutes or do stair climber for 30 minutes and it feels like an hour. But it is always forward.
199
posted on
10/26/2004 10:05:07 PM PDT
by
Porterville
(NEED SOME WOOD?)
To: ckilmer; Alamo-Girl
You can always increase the entropy more by creating a new universe and allowing it to expand and cool off," Carroll explained. So, all I have to do is create a new universe to increase entropy. Some things are just so gosh-darn simple it's a wonder they weren't thought of sooner. Let's see, for tomorrow's to-do list:
1. Feed the fish.
2. Pick up the kids from school.
3. Create new universe (in order to prove new theory correct...)
200
posted on
10/26/2004 10:05:08 PM PDT
by
Ronzo
(GOD alone is enough.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180, 181-200, 201-220 ... 281-299 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson