Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A NEW LOW FOR LIBERALS
DALEY TIMES-POST ^ | OCTOBER 26, 2004 | EDWARD L. DALEY

Posted on 10/26/2004 5:19:10 PM PDT by CHARLITE

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

1 posted on 10/26/2004 5:19:11 PM PDT by CHARLITE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

BTTT


2 posted on 10/26/2004 5:20:36 PM PDT by Fiddlstix (This Tagline for sale. (Presented by TagLines R US))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE
Someone noted that it would take approximately 40 trucks to transport such a stockpile.

They also noted that (to date) we have destroyed over 4,000 equivalent truck loads from around the country and that there is probably another 100 years of searching to find a potential of still another 4000 truck loads buried in that country.
3 posted on 10/26/2004 5:23:34 PM PDT by TwoDogs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fiddlstix

This may be an unintended consequence of the Memogate scandal: News organizations don't want to get scooped by bloggers, so rather than just parroting other outlet's news, they actually (gasp) investigate it.

There's a limited market. News orgs start slamming other orgs in an attempt to increase their market share. The by product is that we actually get news orgs policing themselves.

Score another victory for the Pajama Patrol.


4 posted on 10/26/2004 5:25:02 PM PDT by Terabitten (Live as a bastion of freedom and democracy in the midst of the heart of darkness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

There is always a new low for liberals.


5 posted on 10/26/2004 5:25:52 PM PDT by zoobee (....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE
Only thing I would add is how the UN and IAEA are complicit
6 posted on 10/26/2004 5:35:43 PM PDT by DaveMSmith (I'm not so sure it's credible to quote leading news organizations about -- oh, nevermind. - GWB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE
By any means, this current state of affairs should leave no doubt in anyone's mind that some of the most influential members of the "mainstream" media are steadfastly aligned with John Kerry and his DNC cronies this year, just as they have been in years past with other left-wing presidential candidates.

As far as influence being peddled in this scandal, don't forget to include the good old United Nations. They were willing participants.....

7 posted on 10/26/2004 5:36:29 PM PDT by eeriegeno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

Does anyone have any idea why the Bush people are responding so feebly to all of this?


8 posted on 10/26/2004 5:36:55 PM PDT by djpg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE
This was a planned and coordinated effort between the kerry campaign, the dnc, the MSM and the IAEA(UN). A fact that many may not be aware is that cbs had planned to air this information on Sunday Oct. 31st, just 2 days prior to the election. kerry had an ad out today talking about the stockpile of weapons. Does anyone really believe that they were able to develop, prepare, record and distribute this ad in less than 2 days?

The MSM overlooked the fact that an embedded reporter was with the 101st Airborne. He was no longer employed by the MSM (nbc) and could not be silenced. Thus he was able at a minimum to bring questions up about the validity of the IAEA report.

9 posted on 10/26/2004 5:38:55 PM PDT by Trepz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

ANOTHER new low? Sheesh!


10 posted on 10/26/2004 5:39:00 PM PDT by Doohickey ("This is a hard and dirty war, but when it's over, nothing will ever be too difficult again.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE
The New York Times call it an exclusive. Its a crying shame that the NYT cannot be dissected for this.
11 posted on 10/26/2004 5:39:23 PM PDT by oyez (¡Qué viva la revolución de Reagan!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: djpg
Does anyone have any idea why the Bush people are responding so feebly to all of this?

I don't believe that they should, this is SO obviously a biased, johnny-come-lately story with NO investigative journalism.

Send your complaints to- Email: public@nytimes.com or telephone (212) 556-7652.

12 posted on 10/26/2004 5:43:52 PM PDT by Y0K (NFFC@MyByWordForKerry-Edwards.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

Just when you thought the CBS/NYT/MSM could not go any lower, they go and exceed all expectations! I thought the Bush dwi revelations right before the election set the standard for low 4 years ago.


13 posted on 10/26/2004 5:44:07 PM PDT by The_Media_never_lie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

Just one question.

Were those HE's in the story on the proscibed list of conventional weapons that Saddam wasn't supposed to have?


14 posted on 10/26/2004 5:44:24 PM PDT by wrbones (Where'd I put my tin foil hat....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE
The dummy libs may have tipped their oh so biased hand to the country at large who have had to hear the "Bush lied about WMDs" mantra for three years.

Consider....if explosives can be stolen/missing/transported to Syria, cannot the same be said for WMDs? After all, our troops didn't get there until OVER A YEAR after Bush declared war. That's plenty of time to hide the goods.

15 posted on 10/26/2004 5:46:07 PM PDT by Lizavetta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zoobee

So now there are THREE sure things in life: death, taxes, and liberals stooping to new lows.


16 posted on 10/26/2004 5:47:03 PM PDT by shezza
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

Brit's panel (Krauthammer, Mara and Mort) on Special Report (correctly) made the observation that the administration needs to fight back and defend itself. They simply can't rely on the media to be fair and make corrections. Cheney has responded on the ammo story but the president has never directly addressed it as Kerry whines on and on about the big "blunder' knowing it's a bloody lie. The stakes are just too high in this countdown. Fight back Mr. President!


17 posted on 10/26/2004 5:59:04 PM PDT by lainde (Heads up...We're coming and we've got tongue blades!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

First CBS and now this.

Yep folks there is no left wing media bias. Just look the other way.


18 posted on 10/26/2004 6:01:04 PM PDT by Tempest (Click on my name for a long list of press contacts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Does anyone know what exactly an IAEA seal is?


19 posted on 10/26/2004 6:01:33 PM PDT by Chief_Illinewek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

Don't worry: They can get lower.


20 posted on 10/26/2004 6:02:03 PM PDT by Fledermaus (Kerry is a Nuanced Nuisance!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson