To: perfect stranger
It's nepotism - pure and simple!
There are many people just as qualified who would never get in the door at the FCC.
What do you think is the difference?
24 posted on
10/26/2004 5:03:36 PM PDT by
wireman
To: wireman
At the time of his appointment, both Democrats and Republicans were pursuing his father, who hadn't clearly stated what party he was going to continue in politics in.
He was heading a non-partisan foundation and it was obvious Clinton appointed his son to the position as a token to the father.
26 posted on
10/26/2004 5:12:21 PM PDT by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
To: wireman
"There are many people just as qualified who would never get in the door at the FCC."Fine speculation...show me these people.
Good Grief Man. Michael Powell wasn't just sitting on his @@@ waiting for daddy to help him. I followed my Father into the same field and I wouldn't call it nepotism.
Can you define the line between "given" and "earned" for us?
28 posted on
10/26/2004 5:22:57 PM PDT by
perfect stranger
(The Hummer is a regular Pat Buchanan on wheels." PJ O'Rourke from C&D magazine)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson