Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Prince Charles
Finding "nothing" would seem to indicate that they didn't find what they were looking for, i.e. WMD.

Multiple other reports state that the seals on the bunkers containing the high explosives were still in place at the time of this inspection. In other words, this article doesn't establish that the explosives weren't there in March 2003, and various others say they were.

21 posted on 10/26/2004 12:38:50 PM PDT by lugsoul (Until at last I threw down my enemy and smote his ruin on the mountainside.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: lugsoul
Finding "nothing" would seem to indicate that they didn't find what they were looking for, i.e. WMD. Multiple other reports state that the seals on the bunkers containing the high explosives were still in place at the time of this inspection. In other words, this article doesn't establish that the explosives weren't there in March 2003, and various others say they were.

I have to agree. In fact, it would have been news if the seals had been broken and the explosives missing at that point.

75 posted on 10/26/2004 1:37:40 PM PDT by SlowBoat407 ("Don't bother giving me liberty: I'll take it for myself, thanks.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson