Posted on 10/25/2004 10:11:19 PM PDT by Carling
ping
It's posted go read.
Kerry is such a BASTARD!!!
Looks like a hot one here, Tonk.
October 13, 2004 Edition > Section: National
Printer-friendly version Email this article
Mystery Surrounds Kerry's Navy Discharge
BY THOMAS LIPSCOMB - Special to the Sun
October 13, 2004
An official Navy document on Senator Kerry's campaign Web site listed as Mr. Kerry's "Honorable Discharge from the Reserves" opens a door on a well kept secret about his military service.
The document is a form cover letter in the name of the Carter administration's secretary of the Navy, W. Graham Claytor. It describes Mr. Kerry's discharge as being subsequent to the review of "a board of officers." This in it self is unusual. There is nothing about an ordinary honorable discharge action in the Navy that requires a review by a board of officers.
According to the secretary of the Navy's document, the "authority of reference" this board was using in considering Mr. Kerry's record was "Title 10, U.S. Code Section 1162 and 1163. "This section refers to the grounds for involuntary separation from the service. What was being reviewed, then, was Mr. Kerry's involuntary separation from the service. And it couldn't have been an honorable discharge, or there would have been no point in any review at all. The review was likely held to improve Mr. Kerry's status of discharge from a less than honorable discharge to an honorable discharge.
A Kerry campaign spokesman, David Wade, was asked whether Mr. Kerry had ever been a victim of an attempt to deny him an honorable discharge. There has been no response to that inquiry.
The document is dated February 16, 1978. But Mr. Kerry's military commitment began with his six-year enlistment contract with the Navy on February 18, 1966. His commitment should have terminated in 1972. It is highly unlikely that either the man who at that time was a Vietnam Veterans Against the War leader, John Kerry, requested or the Navy accepted an additional six year reserve commitment. And the Claytor document indicates proceedings to reverse a less than honorable discharge that took place sometime prior to February 1978.
The most routine time for Mr. Kerry's discharge would have been at the end of his six-year obligation, in 1972. But how was it most likely to have come about?
NBC's release this March of some of the Nixon White House tapes about Mr. Kerry show a great deal of interest in Mr. Kerry by Nixon and his executive staff, including, perhaps most importantly, Nixon's special counsel, Charles Colson. In a meeting the day after Mr. Kerry's Senate testimony, April 23, 1971, Mr. Colson attacks Mr. Kerry as a "complete opportunist...We'll keep hitting him, Mr. President."
Mr. Colson was still on the case two months later, according to a memo he wrote on June 15,1971, that was brought to the surface by the Houston Chronicle. "Let's destroy this young demagogue before he becomes another Ralph Nader." Nixon had been a naval officer in World War II. Mr. Colson was a former Marine captain. Mr. Colson had been prodded to find "dirt" on Mr. Kerry, but reported that he couldn't find any.
The Nixon administration ran FBI surveillance on Mr. Kerry from September 1970 until August 1972. Finding grounds for an other than honorable discharge, however, for a leader of the Vietnam Veterans Against the War, given his numerous activities while still a reserve officer of the Navy, was easier than finding "dirt."
For example, while America was still at war, Mr. Kerry had met with the North Vietnamese and Viet Cong delegation to the Paris Peace talks in May 1970 and then held a demonstration in July 1971 in Washington to try to get Congress to accept the enemy's seven point peace proposal without a single change. Woodrow Wilson threw Eugene Debs, a former presidential candidate, in prison just for demonstrating for peace negotiations with Germany during World War I. No court overturned his imprisonment. He had to receive a pardon from President Harding.
Mr. Colson refused to answer any questions about his activities regarding Mr. Kerry during his time in the Nixon White House. The secretary of the Navy at the time during the Nixon presidency is the current chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, Senator Warner. A spokesman for the senator, John Ullyot, said, "Senator Warner has no recollection that would either confirm or challenge any representation that Senator Kerry received a less than honorable discharge."
The "board of officers" review reported in the Claytor document is even more extraordinary because it came about "by direction of the President." No normal honorable discharge requires the direction of the president. The president at that time was James Carter. This adds another twist to the story of Mr. Kerry's hidden military records.
Mr. Carter's first act as president was a general amnesty for draft dodgers and other war protesters. Less than an hour after his inauguration on January 21, 1977, while still in the Capitol building, Mr. Carter signed Executive Order 4483 empowering it. By the time it became a directive from the Defense Department in March 1977 it had been expanded to include other offenders who may have had general, bad conduct, dishonorable discharges, and any other discharge or sentence with negative effect on military records. In those cases the directive outlined a procedure for appeal on a case by case basis before a board of officers. A satisfactory appeal would result in an improvement of discharge status or an honorable discharge.
Mr. Kerry has repeatedly refused to sign Standard Form 180, which would allow the release of all his military records. And some of his various spokesmen have claimed that all his records are already posted on his Web site. But the Washington Post already noted that the Naval Personnel Office admitted that they were still withholding about 100 pages of files.
If Mr. Kerry was the victim of a Nixon "enemies list" hit, one might have expected him to wear it like a badge of honor, like many others such as his friend Daniel Ellsberg, who leaked the Pentagon Papers, CBS's Daniel Schorr, or the actor Paul Newman, who had made Mr. Colson's original list of 20 "enemies."
There are a number of categories of discharges besides honorable. There are general discharges, medical discharges, bad conduct discharges, as well as other than honorable and dishonorable discharges. There is one odd coincidence that gives some weight to the possibility that Mr. Kerry was dishonorably discharged. Mr. Kerry has claimed that he lost his medal certificates and that is why he asked that they be reissued. But when a dishonorable discharge is issued, all pay benefits, and allowances, and all medals and honors are revoked as well. And five months after Mr. Kerry joined the U.S. Senate in 1985, on one single day, June 4, all of Mr. Kerry's medals were reissued.
Printer-friendly version Email this article
© 2004 The New York Sun, One SL, LLC. All rights reserved. Terms of Use
"anyone know how to get in touch with Mary Mapes?"
Just call Joe Lockhart, he's got her number on speed dial....
Oh my God! I'm going to have to add this to the very emailable http://freedomkeys.com/propagandist.htm --- give me a few minutes....
So this is one and the same? Do you think the MSM will pick up on it? Britt Hume was all over the NYTIMES article on his show today. Nothing about the Washington Times lies, though. It's like this guy is wrapped in teflon. nothing sticks.
So where are the documents then..?
They ought to be on The Smoking Gun and on Drudge Report, not referenced by persons citing experts as quoted by a writer for WND.
Kerry was/is a commie dupe or worse, but will this information get out in time to have an effect???? The MSM has carefully avoided anything that will portray the real John Kerry, so why would they pay any attention to this info in the final week of the campaign? It's up to the bloggers and emailers to save the nation....
Imagine if the swiftboat veterans had that attitude and decided not to say what they know?
See if this will work:
http://ice.he.net/~freepnet/fbifiles/100-HQ-448092/Section%2015/Section%2015.pdf
Many of the documents are in Vietnamese and have not been translated yet.
Don't let Sandy Berger in there! Tomorrow's going to be fun newsday.
go the swifty site, Navy Chief said it will be a one-two punch.
Where's buckhead when we need him?
I. The antiwar movements in the US are npredictable. They have been widely developed from Washington DC and New York to other states. At the beginning only a small number of people in the middle class, intellectuals, students, writers, artists, and religious people joined these movements, but now they have rallied a large number of people, including members of the Senate and House of Representatives, former ministers and ambassadors, ex-service men, repatriated soldiers, draftees, service men, and a portion of the working class. The majority of US workers are not politically aware because the US labor unions (supporting the government) only motivated them to struggle for their own interests.
The spontaneous antiwar movements in the US have recieved assistance and guidance from the friendly (VC/NVN) delegations at the Paris Peace Talks. Of the antiwar movements, the two most important ones are: The PCPJ (the Peoples Committee for Peace and Justice) and the NPAC (National Peace Action Committee). These two movements have gathered much stregnth and staged many demonstrations. The PCPJ is the most important. It retains relations with us through its activities, we see that the PCPJ has made progress in its newly adopted policy line with the following strategic alterations:
1. To gain success in struggles, it is necessary to stregnthen internal unity, contact other associations, other social classes, and influential personalities and take part in (US Congressional) elections (instead of boycotting them) to eliminate reactonary candidates and plant progressive people in the Senate and House of Representatives.
2.
I donated Friday.
If only the MSM worked over each side equally.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.