Posted on 10/25/2004 7:11:50 PM PDT by Chicos_Bail_Bonds
NBCNEWS: Huge Cache of Explosives Vanished From Site in Iraq -- At Least 18 Months Ago (SIREN ALERT)
(Excerpt) Read more at drudgereport.com ...
'Rove, Gillespie, Racicot, et al need to jump on this with both feet. They need to link sKerry to this anti-American, pro-terrorist institution.'
```````````````````````````````````
I am sure they are well prepared to answer to this, as they set the whole thing up.
That's Lockhart's code name this week.
oh boy, this is gonna be good. Looks like the Kerry campaign is gonna ride this titanic lie down a ways before giving up.
Well, we know the State Dept. is full of these people (and has been since the end of the war--WWII, that is--as far as I know), and I'm sure it isn't the only place.
Next week, he can go back to being Fifi (Kerry's special pet name for him when they're alone together).
According to the DUmmies:
Lockhart Statement Regarding BC04 Efforts to Cover Up Bushs Failure to Secure Explosives in Iraq
Washington, DC - In response to reports that the Bush campaign is distorting an NBC news report in an effort to cover up the White Houses failure to secure 380 tons of explosive material in Iraq, Kerry-Edwards senior advisor Joe Lockhart released the following statement:
In a shameless attempt to cover up its failure to secure 380 tons of highly explosive material in Iraq, the White House is desperately flailing in an effort to escape blame. Instead of distorting John Kerrys words, the Bush campaign is now falsely and deliberately twisting the reports of journalists. It is the latest pathetic excuse from an administration that never admits a mistake, no matter how disastrous.
I thought if The New York Times wasn't in the same Swiftboat as Bush they couldn't criticize anything he did in wartime.
Could be one report is referring to to the high yield explosives and the other to the "regular" explosives.
Good for you.. I guess that this is another take on the theory ...if it feels good do it.
Hahaha. Great strategy: screw up your facts and then pretend someone else did it. Thats like farting and then blaming it on an invisible elephant in the room.
This is priceless.
Oh, tell me you made that up. That can't seriously be what they're saying now? They have lost it completely.
Give the NYT editor your thoughts on this crap.
managing-editor@nytimes.com
Stupid RATS!
Maybe the Times is secretly working for Bush.
The guy who is really fixing to eat dirt here is that rumpled sissy Josh Marshall. He's always tilting at these white whale conspiracy theories he thinks will bring down Bush--to no avail.
He who denied it supplied it.
Are you serious? Are they really saying that Bush is twisting the words of a jounalist?
Yet this is exactly what happened with Rathergate. McAwful tried to blame it on the Republicans. It didn't work then and it won't work now. This could be huge trouble for Kerry et. al. if Bush hops on it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.