Posted on 10/25/2004 7:14:46 AM PDT by crushelits
This man is a FRAUD.
Kerry would make ZERO mistakes. He has a plan. </smartarse>
Kerry is preaching to the choir at this point. No worries. Bush has it locked. It's just a matter of beating voter fraud.
Anything do diminish Operation Iraqi Freedom and elevate himself.
bumb
This type of "story" and Kerry's assinine assertions are what make me feel good about a very strong electoral victory.
People don't like Kerry. They don't like that he says obviously wrong and injurious things about our President and our country.
The myopia of the left is unbounded.
It is such an eyeopener to me to see just how truly bias the MSM is and what a part it plays in propaganda!!!! Kerry will not win....Bush will and win big! Americans have opened their eyes to what is going on...ever since Memogate...thanks to Dan Rather! By the way...what happened to that story?????????
But Kerry says Iraq has nothing to do with the War on Terror.
bump for later
I didn't see 350 tons of munitions. Did you see them? Did they exist? I don't think so. I think they were destroyed by Saddam with his WMD's back before the war even started.
Did Blixy see them? I don't think so. And why is the IAEA concerned? The weapons aren't nuclear.
I am confused. Did the times mean that this stockpile existed before it didn't exist?
Brilliant analysis....Post this everywhere you can. The NY Times has once again given Kerry his talking points. Remember, if we beat Kerry we beat the MSM too!!!!!!!
Right before he said Bush has made Itaq a breeding ground for terrorists.
"If it weren't for the invasion by the Coalition, these 350 tons of explosives would be safely in the hands of Saddam Hussein, where they posed no threat to anyone!"
LOL !
Given that the explosives were gone before the Americans got there that proves that Saddam was violating the UN sanctions. Nothing happened his fiefdom without his approval. And if Kerry is right and the explosives are in the hands of terrorists, it was Saddam himself who put it in their hands...thus supporting the link between SH and terrorists. And by the way, Kerry claims there were no terrorists in Iraq to give the explosives to until we got there.
If I remember correctly the first priority was a Dam, that could have killed thousands. Next, chemical weapons storage and some locations which were suspect. The third priority was the oil fields, to prevent against sabotage. Last year, the MSM complained about the Iraq Museum and looting. Now one week before the election, this news comes out...hmmmmm
IOW, Saddam followed the Vietnam model.
Kerry is all over the map - "I would have caught Osama, I would have built a coalition, I wouldn't have 'outsourced' the operation, I would have sent more troops, I would not have 'rushed to war", etc." There's no coherent policy coming from him because, among other things, HIS STATEMENTS CONTRADICT EACH OTHER!!! He doesn't know what the &#%! he's talking about and will say ANYTHING to get elected! Throw enough claptrap against the wall and hope some of it will stick. I pray the country is not stupid enough to swallow his nonsense.
And yes, I am disappointed that Bush did not just put him away rhetorically in the debates. No good to dwell on that now. We need Bush to be re-elected, no doubt! We have a lot of work to do! And don't expect the "electioneering" to be over on Nov. 2. Remember 2000. Be ready for overtime!
Although I hope and believe that Bush will win decisively. :)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.