Posted on 10/25/2004 2:55:50 AM PDT by kingattax
The Guardian has taken a remarkable step by replacing a column in which the writer appeared to call for the assasination of George W Bush with an apology.
The columnist, Charlie Brooker, reviews television programmes for the Guardian.
In his October 3 column, "Dumb Show", Mr Brooker reviewed the debates between Mr Kerry and Mr Bush and found both candidates lacking -- but reserved a particularly venomous evaluation for Mr Bush.
He wrote: Throughout the debate, John Kerry, for his part, looks and sounds a bit like a haunted tree. But at least he's not a lying, sniggering, drink-driving, selfish, reckless, ignorant, dangerous, backward, drooling, twitching, blinking, mouse-faced little cheat. And besides, in a fight between a tree and a bush, I know who I'd favour.
It was the closing paragraph, howver, that got global attention.
In that passage, Mr Brooker wrote: On November 2, the entire civilised world will be praying, praying Bush loses. And Sod's law dictates he'll probably win, thereby disproving the existence of God once and for all. The world will endure four more years of idiocy, arrogance and unwarranted bloodshed, with no benevolent deity to watch over and save us. John Wilkes Booth, Lee Harvey Oswald, John Hinckley Jr - where are you now that we need you?
Today, the Guardian withdrew the column from its website, replacing it with this:
The final sentence of a column in The Guide on Saturday caused offence to some readers. The Guardian associates itself with the following statement from the writer.
"Charlie Brooker apologises for any offence caused by his comments relating to President Bush in his TV column, Screen Burn. The views expressed in this column are not those of the Guardian. Although flippant and tasteless, his closing comments were intended as an ironic joke, not as a call to action - an intention he believed regular readers of his humorous column would understand. He deplores violence of any kind."
All of which leads one to wonder whether the Guardian doesn't have a special, private dictionary in which "irony" has a definition not readily available to the rest of the world.
Welcome as the apology was, it fell short. Ironically, the Guardian seems unaware of the full import of the original column. But the well known Powerline Blog perhaps summed it up best: "This is, of course, where the liberal campaign of hatred and violence has been going for some time. I do think it is likely that someone will get killed; I hope it isn't President Bush. One can only wonder: if such a tragedy occurs, will the liberals come to their senses?"
editor@guardianunlimited.co.uk charlie.brooker@zeppotron.com
".....will the liberals come to their senses?"
Nope. They have ventured out too far into the delusional Mikey Moore/Howie Dean fever swamps.
"Mistakes were made."
Yea right...Funny...ha..ha...
apparently the exec editor of this puke rag is an ex-clinton
advisor.
that sure explains a lot
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1255934/posts
No, the paper is a tasteless joke, the article was just evidence of that fact.
Just add to the list of known American enemies.
I just sent this to the Guardian Editor.
“Guardian says sorry, call for assassins was just a tasteless joke”
Dear Sir,
Like most Americans I have followed, with disgust and anger, your paper’s attempt to intervene in the American election, first by influencing the vote in Ohio, and then by calling for the outright assassination of our president. Therefore, when I read the above headline this morning in an American newspaper, I couldn’t help but think, “No, the Guardian itself is the tasteless joke, the article in question is merely evidence of that fact.”
Sincerely,
An Open Letter to the Guardian
Regards, Ivan
I suspect it was Blair.
Regards, Ivan
Never in a million years, if human beings are still around. The hate America crowd and their commie followers love controversy. The democrats are only happy when a piece of work like klintoon is in office. Then everything is everything for the demo-commies living in their Utopian facade. We should send them on a tour of Dafur. They need to see the results of what has happened due to lack of caring by them and their great UN.Bush/Cheney 2004
MI 5 or is it 6? perhaps...by the way that was one heck of a letter.....If you wrote it, great job! On a scale from one to ten I give it a ten......
He wrote it. Nice boot to their bullocks, Ivan.
Tasteless joke? sort of like tasteless jokes in the airport security line, those we all do, bomb jokes. These jokers are low, really low.
Excellent letter, Ivan.
Well said, Ivan!
A joke? Like hell it was.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.