FairOpinion, I am sorry to see that you are pissed off the fact that I didn't vote for a pro-amnesty candidate like Bush. I deeply regreted that Pres. Bush lost my vote when blantly decided to agree that the US should participate in the FTAA (Free Trade Agreement of the Americas) or the fact that Pres. Bush wanted to give amnesty to 15 million illegal aliens or the fact that Pres. Bush appointed a homosexual named Michael Guest, as ambassador to Romania.
I am not in the business of compromising my conservative belief on something that I don't want to trade in. I vote according to strict conservative beliefs.
Michael Anthony Peroutka and his running mate Pastor Chuck Baldwin are individuals that stand on Judeo-Christian principles and beliefs and I do deeply share my belief in Jesus Christ as my Lord and Savior.
Michael Anthony Peroutka will solve the abortion problem by providing a strict litmus test when it comes to judicial nominations to the Supreme Court or the Appelette Court. Michael Peroutka will do whatever he believes he will do to put an end to the genocidial practice of abortions by overturning Roe Vs. Wade.
Psssssst. Peroutka could promise you that Christianity would become the official religion in America...and it would mean as much as his other promises. Nothing.
Is it starting to dawn on you that your "candidate" is nothing more then smoke and mirrors?
Don't you get it? If you didn't vote for Bush, YOU VOTED FOR KERRY.
DO YOU PREFER KERRY?
Do your fellow Republicans know that?
Then WHY are you or claim to be a registered Republican, even treasurer of your Republican club, if you hate Republicans?
He can put all the litmus tests on he wants - Supreme Court justice contenders still have to get past the US Senate. Even if they *do* get approved, they can do whatever they want once they're in that chair. Further, there have to be enough of them to hopefully make a majority, and that's not a guarantee in any President's term. IOW, the President can't directly "end abortion," even if he claims he can.