Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 7mmMag@LeftCoast
No it wasn't! The article Clearly states that IAEA abandoned the site BEFORE the invasion and clearly admits in the very beginning days of the war the marines went through the site and NOTHING was there. Any moron (yes even a DU'er) will know that Saddam moved the material during the WEEKS that the IAEA abandoned the site until the U.S. Marines arrived.

Can you post the sections of the article that say the above? Thanks.

201 posted on 10/24/2004 8:19:15 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army and Proudly Supporting BUSH/CHENEY 2004!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies ]


To: xzins

Sure! You make this way to easy. Just gotta read the following 3 paragraphs from the article.

In New York on Feb. 14, nine days after Secretary of State Colin L. Powell presented his arms case to the Security Council, Dr. ElBaradei reported that the I.A.E.A. had found no sign of new atom endeavors but "has continued to investigate the relocation and consumption of the high explosive HMX."

A senior Bush administration official said that during the initial race to Baghdad, American forces "went through the bunkers, but saw no materials bearing the I.A.E.A. seal."

The agency, Dr. ElBaradei added pointedly, "has received no such notifications or declarations from any state since the agency's inspectors were withdrawn from Iraq in March 2003."



They were missing in February, IAEA left BEFORE the invasion. We get there, place is empty.

The rest of the article is bunch of jibberish designed to hide the above facts from the weak minded DU'er and Sheeple crowd.


221 posted on 10/24/2004 8:42:00 PM PDT by 7mmMag@LeftCoast ("....to defend the Constitution of the United States, against all enemies, foreign and domestic")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies ]

To: xzins

There's nothing to worry about, Saddaam had no WMD's heck he was too weak from 12 years of sanctions. Even the NYT came to that conclusion. Now they are flip-flopping on this?

LOL


224 posted on 10/24/2004 8:46:39 PM PDT by bubman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies ]

To: xzins
No it wasn't! The article Clearly states that IAEA abandoned the site BEFORE the invasion and clearly admits in the very beginning days of the war the marines went through the site and NOTHING was there. Any moron (yes even a DU'er) will know that Saddam moved the material during the WEEKS that the IAEA abandoned the site until the U.S. Marines arrived.

"A MINUTE AGO, FOX NEWS JUST REPORTED THIS. 12:07 AM EST"

The Fox reporter also said something like the "looting"
could have happened late as LAST SATURDAY

236 posted on 10/24/2004 9:21:01 PM PDT by crushelits
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson