Skip to comments.
The NYT/Drudge Bombshell: Huge Cache of Explosives Vanished From Site in Iraq
NY Times ^
| JAMES GLANZ, WILLIAM J. BROAD and DAVID E. SANGER
Posted on 10/24/2004 7:21:04 PM PDT by icecold
Edited on 10/25/2004 6:42:02 AM PDT by Admin Moderator.
[history]
Huge Cache of Explosives Vanished From Site in Iraq By JAMES GLANZ, WILLIAM J. BROAD and DAVID E. SANGER
Published: October 25, 2004
This article was reported and written by James Glanz, William J. Broad and David E. Sanger.
BAGHDAD, Iraq, Oct. 24 - The Iraqi interim government has warned the United States and international nuclear inspectors that nearly 380 tons of powerful conventional explosives - used to demolish buildings, produce missile warheads and detonate nuclear weapons - are missing from one of Iraq's most sensitive former military installations.
The huge facility, called Al Qaqaa, was supposed to be under American military control but is now a no man's land, still picked over by looters as recently as Sunday. United Nations weapons inspectors had monitored the explosives for many years, but White House and Pentagon officials acknowledge that the explosives vanished sometime after the American-led invasion last year.
The White House said President Bush's national security adviser, Condoleezza Rice, was informed within the past month that the explosives were missing. It is unclear whether President Bush was informed. American officials have never publicly announced the disappearance, but beginning last week they answered questions about it posed by The New York Times and the CBS News program "60 Minutes......"
TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: explosives; iraq; napalminthemorning; newyorktimes; nytrogate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140, 141-160, 161-180 ... 361-364 next last
To: Josh in PA
EVERYONE EVERYONE!!
It's time for Kerry to start his monday night quarterbacking tomorrow!!
In Scary Kerry's voice:
If I were the president, the weapons wouldn't have gone missing under my watch. The president made a grave mistake not guarding these weapons to make sure they are not used against us. The buck stops at the President's desk. It's time for new leadership, leadership that can get the job done. President Bush, You're fired!
Thunderous applause coming from the sheep in the audience.
141
posted on
10/24/2004 7:55:47 PM PDT
by
blakep
To: icecold
I could almost swear I had heard this earlier. I really don't see a major problem for Bush on this. My guess is the campaign has known about this and is prepared to respond, if necessary.
To: icecold
760,000 lbs of high explosives disappeared, but 40,000 lbs of anthrax missing means it didn't exist. Go figure
143
posted on
10/24/2004 7:56:18 PM PDT
by
cookcounty
(Kerry launched his career by trashing the VN Vets. He ends by trashing the NG. Such class.)
To: ladyinred
Kerry doesn't truly care if there were WMD's or not...
144
posted on
10/24/2004 7:56:19 PM PDT
by
KMC1
To: Pikamax
A European diplomat reported that Jacques Baute, head of the I.A.E.A.'s Iraq nuclear inspection team, warned officials at the United States mission in Vienna about the danger of the nuclear sites and materials once under I.A.E.A. supervision, including Al Qaqaa. So if the French and other Eurocrats were so darned worried, then why didn't they volunteer troops to help guard the facilities after the invasion? Two-faced wienies....
145
posted on
10/24/2004 7:56:52 PM PDT
by
Log
To: Pikamax
That's it? This is the article that's going to get Kerry elected?
146
posted on
10/24/2004 7:56:52 PM PDT
by
ShandaLear
(Vote Kerry! He knows what you've got and just who to give it to!)
To: Kerrymakesmesleepy
I don't think you've actually followed my posts. The explosives missing is old news. What I was concerned about was what oceanview mentioned about it being the start of a larger story and I connected the dots with what a newbie had mentioned earlier.
Go read my posts. The thought of the remote possibility that Kerry and the Dems could have foreknowledge of a catastrophic attack on our soldiers and are getting this info from the terrorists through Zarqawi without Kerry doing anything to stop it was what was making me feel ill.
The enemy of my enemy is my friend.
147
posted on
10/24/2004 7:57:46 PM PDT
by
hansel
To: tdice7
148
posted on
10/24/2004 7:57:58 PM PDT
by
rwfromkansas
(BYPASS FORCED WEB REGISTRATION! **** http://www.bugmenot.com ****)
To: AmishDude
IAEA=UN=Oil for Food You think so? I thought they were pretty good. I haven't heard that they were involved in any scandals. They identified the Niger documents as forgeries within a couple of days. They've kept pretty good records of uranium transfers and production. Why don't you like them.
To: rocklobster11
Karl Rove planted the story. This is great. He's playing chess Explain, please.
To: Kerrymakesmesleepy
Ever think this is the way the Whitehouse shows there are WMDs? That's a delightful speculation, but this story doesn't establishment, so more will have to be forth coming toute de suite.
151
posted on
10/24/2004 7:58:38 PM PDT
by
Petronski
(On the land in the air on the sea, let's swing out to Victory. --Fats Waller)
To: Petronski
After 5 minutes on Google, it would seem you were correct. Good instincts.
152
posted on
10/24/2004 7:58:48 PM PDT
by
Wormwood
(Iä! Iä! Cthulhu fhtagn!)
To: Petronski
Agreed. Since I'm new here, I thought I'd let someone else question his troll-like behavior (something I learned while lurking).
To: snooker
" Did anyone hear Tommy Franks describe the amount of explosives and ammo found in Iraq? He said he had never seen anything like it, never imagined any country would store that must explosives. So how is this news?" I remember estimates before the war that 30% of the conventional explosives in the entire world were in Iraq, in "too many" locations to keep track of.
154
posted on
10/24/2004 7:59:11 PM PDT
by
cookcounty
(Kerry launched his career by trashing the VN Vets. He ends by trashing the NG. Such class.)
To: cookcounty
That's what I can't figure out. If it's missing, how does one know it ever existed?
The WMD's are missing also.
155
posted on
10/24/2004 7:59:36 PM PDT
by
zeebee
(John Kerry- whichever way the wind blows)
To: icecold
This is no bombshell.
It's a dud.
156
posted on
10/24/2004 7:59:42 PM PDT
by
FairOpinion
(GET OUT THE VOTE. ENSURE A BUSH/CHENEY WIN.)
To: Josh in PA
It is not near as severe as the talking points memo made it sound.
157
posted on
10/24/2004 7:59:53 PM PDT
by
rwfromkansas
(BYPASS FORCED WEB REGISTRATION! **** http://www.bugmenot.com ****)
To: icecold
Drudge said on his radio show that he thinks the White House leaked this report to get the focus back on the war on terror.
To: icecold
Mommy, I'm bored. Can we go home now?
159
posted on
10/24/2004 8:00:59 PM PDT
by
Freepdonia
(Victory is Ours!)
To: Josh in PA
swifties have it. It's suppose to be in the Wash. Times tomorrow. If it's what they say it is, it wont be that effective unless someone can spin it to make it effective.
Kerry Says He Met With UN Security Council
In the same speech to a Unity Conference of minority journalists where John Kerry criticized President Bush for his immediate reaction to the 9-11 attacks, he again raised the assertion that he had met with foreign leaders prior to the vote on the war in Iraq on March 11. His latest comments shed some light on exactly who those foreign leaders were.
ATLANTA, GA (PRWEB) August 11, 2004 -- (GoodNewsAmerica.us)- In the same speech to a Unity Conference of minority journalists where John Kerry criticized President Bush for his immediate reaction to the 9-11 attacks, he again raised the assertion that he had met with foreign leaders prior to the vote on the war in Iraq on March 11. His latest comments shed some light on exactly who those foreign leaders were.
" I believe in my heart of hearts and in my gut that this president fails that test in Iraq. And I know this because I, personally, and others were deeply involved in the effort with other countries to bring them to the table. I met with the Security Council of the United Nations in the week preceding the vote in the Senate."
It still remains to be known with whom he met on the Security Council, unless it was the entire Security Council. If so, there is no official record of Kerry formally meeting with the full Security Council.
Further, if he did, nothing has been found documenting permission given by the State Department to do so.
The History
At a Hollywood, FL fundraising event on March 8, Senator John Kerry announced he had received word from unnamed foreign leaders who wanted to see him defeat President Bush in the November elections.
"I've met foreign leaders who can't go out and say this publicly, but boy they look at you and say, 'You've got to win this, you've got to beat this guy, we need a new policy,' things like that," he said.
Although Boston Globe reporter Patrick Healy revised the original quote from a pool report to "more leaders", Mr. Kerry did not back down from his assertions. Again on March 14 Mr. Kerry made his claim, but continued to resist naming names while under pressure after remarks by Secretary of State Colin Powell.
"I'm not going to betray a private conversation with anybody," he said. "I have heard from people, foreign leaders elsewhere in the world who don't appreciate the Bush administration and would love to see a change in the leadership of the United States."
The Washington Times conducted interviews with embassies of countries opposing the war in Iraq and concluded that there had been no meetings between Mr. Kerry and foreign heads of state since the beginning of 2003. After a review of Mr. Kerry's schedule, it was shown he had no opportunities for personal meetings with foreign heads of state, save one on September 24 when the New Zealand Foreign Minister was in Washington. Several foreign leaders including Germany's Schroeder and the Australian Foreign Minister deny any contact with Kerry.
160
posted on
10/24/2004 8:01:07 PM PDT
by
stylin19a
(It's called GOLF because all the other 4 letter words were taken)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140, 141-160, 161-180 ... 361-364 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson