Skip to comments.
Numerical Poll Analysis: ABC News/WaPost, ARG, CBS, Fox, Gallup, LA Times, NBC/WSJ, Newsweek, Time.
The Washington Post, (et al) ^
| October 24th, 2004
| dvwjr
Posted on 10/24/2004 5:27:42 PM PDT by dvwjr
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-36 last
To: dvwjr
Note the big difference in voter preferences among independents in the Fox poll versus Newsweek.
To: MOgirl
Greetings, Mogirl - If I'm not mistaken FEC means Federal Elections Commission.
22
posted on
10/24/2004 7:23:37 PM PDT
by
Paperdoll
(.........Tell it to a Bush)
To: Paperdoll
Hello,
I thought that FEC was the Federal Election Commission, I just did not realize that they conducted polls. Color me surprised!
Glad to be here, MOgirl
23
posted on
10/24/2004 7:30:46 PM PDT
by
MOgirl
(In memory of Walton Wayne Callahan, I love you forever.)
To: MOgirl
FEC. I'm pretty sure they'll be involved in the poll we take on Nov 2nd but other than that I'm suprised too.
24
posted on
10/24/2004 8:30:26 PM PDT
by
festus
(Whats the frequency Kenneth ?)
To: dvwjr
25
posted on
10/24/2004 8:37:33 PM PDT
by
SueAngel
(Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.)
To: dvwjr
26
posted on
10/24/2004 8:55:19 PM PDT
by
TheErnFormerlyKnownAsBig
(You can turn your head away from the Berg video and still hear Al Queda's calls to prayer.)
To: MOgirl
We were polled last Friday the same way, my hubby did not catch who it was from, it was also computer generated. Of course voted BUSH et al
To: dvwjr
28
posted on
10/24/2004 9:02:28 PM PDT
by
68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub
(GET OUT THE VOTE NOV 2 ! IF YOUR NEIGHBORS OR RELATIVES NEED A RIDE TO THE POLLS OFFER TO HELP)
To: SteveMcKing
I thought I had wondered by mistake into USA Today . . . .
To: dvwjr
Thanks for the ping. Great work, as always. Try to ignore the ungrateful ingrates on this thread
30
posted on
10/25/2004 12:08:40 AM PDT
by
NYC Republican
(Skerry talks about building coalitions...He voted NO in the Gulf War, Yes this time...Flip-Flop Liar)
To: NYC Republican
Doesn't bother me in the least. If it were not for the color, they would find something else to harp on. Human nature, etc.
I could not believe the request to 'graph' the data. Folks have spreadsheets and can import the HTML tables directly and play with the data to their hearts content. I wonder what their 'graph' would show???
I have been working on the Washington Post tracking poll, but they have a bad habit of putting out weekend polls with no internals available on the Washington Post content-server, which means that there is NO way to check on the partisan preferences for critical days. This allows the ABC and Post organizations to 'hide' their internals right before the election, with only the Monday data before the election to be shown, allowing them to correct any 'skews' for Kerry over the weekend. They have been neglecting to show any weekend data since the tracking poll started, with ABC being the worst offender. They put out nothing of value except the end numbers.
We shall see...
dvwjr
31
posted on
10/25/2004 12:53:42 AM PDT
by
dvwjr
To: dvwjr
So if I'm reading this right (and I might not be), I look at where both Bush and Kerry were in May and then in October, it looks like Bush's numbers have increased but Kerry's have dropped in many cases.
To: dvwjr
33
posted on
10/25/2004 10:22:56 AM PDT
by
lilylangtree
(Veni, Vidi, Vici)
To: dvwjr
Interesting, the polls split on who has more "Independents", but every single poll has Bush getting more Democrats the Kerry gets Republicans.
My interpretation is that Bush has a more energized base.
34
posted on
10/25/2004 10:43:15 AM PDT
by
AndyTheBear
(Disastrous social experimentation is the opiate of elitist snobs.)
To: dvwjr
I'm impressed with how utterly inconsistent the polls are about the preferences of independents. Those numbers strike me as quite odd.
35
posted on
10/25/2004 3:42:05 PM PDT
by
labard1
To: SteveMcKing
I can't believe that even 10% of republicans would vote for kerry- OVER WHAT?? I've been getting emails from some outfit called "Republicans for Change." One was written by Dwight Eisenhower's son John, another by some ex-governor of Minnesota. When I try to write them back to tell them any group urging the election of Hanoi John should be called "Republicans for Treason," the reply bounces.
36
posted on
10/25/2004 3:48:40 PM PDT
by
VadeRetro
(A self-reliant conservative citizenry is a better bet than the subjects of an overbearing state. -MS)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-36 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson