Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

The following is the explanation for the Kerry endorsement by my local fish wrap.
http://www.caller.com/ccct/opinion_columnists/article/0,1641,CCCT_843_3278147,00.html

Endorsing Kerry was a tough call

One of the hardest decisions I've made in 15 months as editor is the lead editorial that appears on the Editorial Page today.

For reasons spelled out there, the Caller-Times Editorial Board decided to endorse Sen. John Kerry for president. It's a recommendation that I know will upset more than a few people, while others will wholeheartedly agree.

The presidential endorsement process was a new one for us this year. Previously, all Scripps newspapers endorsed as a group, which meant that the same presidential endorsement appeared in all Scripps newspapers. The Caller-Times joined the Scripps family in 1997, and we ran the corporate-wide endorsement of Bush in 2000.

That long-standing tradition ended this year when the Scripps Board of Directors asked the editors their thoughts on the process. The majority of the editors wanted local control over the presidential endorsement, pointing out that what makes sense in one community might not in another. So the responsibility was handed to the editorial boards of the individual Scripps papers.

The Caller-Times Editorial Board is made up of myself, President and Publisher Patrick J. Birmingham, Editorial Page Editor Nick Jimenez, Viewpoints Editor Murphy Givens and Senior Editorial Writer Brooks Peterson.

We've all followed the race closely, researched the candidates and watched the debates. We met as a group several times to discuss the issues - health care, education, homeland security, the economy and the war in Iraq.

The uncomfortable consensus is for Kerry.

I say "uncomfortable" because this was a difficult decision. We've known and liked George Bush for years. As governor, he visited and impressed our Editorial Board several times. As a reporter, I covered some of his local visits and always found him to be likable, easy-going and informed.

Bush was a strong and effective leader of our state. We supported him as governor, and I'm sure we would have endorsed him independently in 2000 even if Scripps hadn't had the corporate-wide policy at the time. But as outlined in our editorial today, we've not seen those traits in his performance as president, and are increasingly alarmed at the direction he is taking the country.

I'm aware that Bush carried Nueces County in 2000 with 51 percent of the vote, and may well carry it again this year. This is Texas, after all, and he's still one of us.

I understand that a Kerry endorsement may not reflect the beliefs of many in this community who support Bush. But I believe the duty of an editorial board is not to necessarily do what's popular, but to offer a well-thought-out opinion that residents can either accept or disregard.

My greatest concern about this election is the fierce polarization that has split our country, and I pray that an endorsement from us does not feed that division locally. I believe in our political system and our right to choose candidates whom best reflect what we want for this country.

But I also believe in a system where there is room for disagreement and that such dissent is vital to the success of our democracy. That difference of opinion should be respected - not cause for mean-spirited attacks on those who hold views opposite to our own.

Some papers choose not to endorse. That's the safest path, and one that ensures that no one gets angry at the newspaper. But I believe we have a responsibility to share our beliefs with our readers and give them our best possible recommendation on the candidates. Readers also should understand that our editorial is simply that - our belief about this race, as subjective as that may be. It doesn't make us right; it doesn't make us wrong. Our endorsement is our best possible assessment of who we believe is the right person for the job.

I hope that's how each of you will go into this election, through a process of evaluating the candidates, making the choice that feels right in your heart and then respecting the opinions of those who may disagree.

When it comes right down to it, we all have to do what we think is right and then be gracious enough to allow others to do the same.


1 posted on 10/24/2004 1:21:15 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Paleo Conservative

The Ca Ca Times might just lose me as a subscriber for this nonsense.


2 posted on 10/24/2004 1:23:30 PM PDT by The South Texan (The Democrat Party and the leftist (ABCCBSNBCCNN NYLATIMES)media are a criminal enterprise!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Paleo Conservative

I didn't read any of it. "Need" for change? Why do lib yearnings always become a "need" of America? America "needs" to pledge allegiance to the UN mafia rather than the US Constitution?


3 posted on 10/24/2004 1:24:31 PM PDT by Sirc_Valence (As socialists formed trade unions against employers the ACLU formed against the U.S.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MeekOneGOP; Theodore R.; SwinneySwitch; JoJo Gunn; goldstategop; JennysCool; MadIvan; ...
BARF ALERT!

Corpus Christi Caller-Times endorses Kerry.

4 posted on 10/24/2004 1:25:04 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative (Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Dan Rather's got to go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Paleo Conservative
Three years later, the nation stands bitterly divided.


Must of been a DNC Talking point memo sent out to all the Newspapers telling them to include this line. This is like the 10 or 12 Kerry endorsement that carrys it.

Funny a guy who has run the most ideologically drive mean spirited personal attack oriented political campaign in modern US History is suppose to "unite us"?

Note to Moron Newspaper Editors. Kerry is ONLY running against things. If he were to get elected, he would have to find a NEW set of enemies to run against. If you wanted a Uniter the ONLY choice is GW Bush. Funny how you deliberately overlooked GW Bush who has Democrats like Zell Miller, Ron Silverstein and Ed Koch campaigning FOR him. But I guess the directions from the DNC didn't include that fact.
6 posted on 10/24/2004 1:31:39 PM PDT by MNJohnnie (Vote Bush 2004-We cannot survive a 9-10 President in a 9-11 World)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Paleo Conservative

Just more proof that some of the people reading this stuff know more than all of the people who write it.


10 posted on 10/24/2004 1:48:38 PM PDT by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Paleo Conservative
"Sen. Kerry offers a change and a lifetime of service to the nation. We believe the voters ought to elect him president."

RIGHT - WAKE UP FOLKS!

11 posted on 10/24/2004 2:14:31 PM PDT by Gucho
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Paleo Conservative

I don't believe this Corpus Christi editor. Endorsing Kerry was her only alternative for her own peace of mind. Corpus is a very liberal city and has been since there have been two-party elections.


12 posted on 10/24/2004 3:52:42 PM PDT by Theodore R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Paleo Conservative
One can only marvel at such idiocy.

The best the Left could do for this election was a Hanoi Jane???

22 posted on 10/24/2004 5:32:05 PM PDT by JoJo Gunn (Help control the Leftist population - have them spayed or neutered.©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson