Posted on 10/24/2004 12:19:13 PM PDT by West Coast Conservative
The role of commander in chief is clearly one of the president's most important jobs. But a presidential campaign provides voters little opportunity to evaluate how a candidate would handle that role, particularly if the candidate isn't an incumbent.
At the end of last year, during 3 1/2 hours of interviews over two days, I asked President Bush hundreds of detailed questions about his actions and decisions during the 16-month run-up to the war in Iraq. His answers were published in my book "Plan of Attack." Beginning on June 16, I had discussions and meetings with Sen. John Kerry's senior foreign policy, communications and political advisers about interviewing the senator to find out how he might have acted on Iraq -- to ask him what he would have done at certain key points. Senior Kerry advisers initially seemed positive about such an interview. One aide told me, "The short answer is yes, it's going to happen."
In August, I was talking with Kerry's scheduler about possible dates. On Sept. 1, Kerry began his intense criticism of Bush's decisions in the Iraq war, saying "I would've done almost everything differently." A few days later, I provided the Kerry campaign with a list of 22 possible questions based entirely on Bush's actions leading up to the war and how Kerry might have responded in the same situations. The senator and his campaign have since decided not to do the interview, though his advisers say Kerry would have strong and compelling answers.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
I wish President Bush should spend this last week asking: "What is your plan, Mr. Kerry?"
Kerry wouldnt answer the questions?!?
Classic! Shows really the lack of leadership at play here.
I gotta plan! I gotta plan! I gotta plan! I gotta plan! I gotta plan! I gotta plan! I gotta plan! I gotta plan!I gotta plan! I gotta plan! I gotta plan! I gotta plan!I gotta plan! I gotta plan! I gotta plan! I gotta plan! I woulda formed a coalition. I could do it better.
Hey Bob! There's twenty two answers. so what more doya want?
I hear that he has a plan that is smarter, better, more sensitive, too.
I agree with you. The questions as worded cannot be answered by an opponent, who has not been in the situation of actually making the decisions.
These questions are digs at the decisions made by Bush all along the way. - not consulting with certain people - not listening to other people, eg Powell - secret transfers of money - and on and on
I agree with you. The questions as worded cannot be answered by an opponent, who has not been in the situation of actually making the decisions.
These questions are digs at the decisions made by Bush all along the way. - not consulting with certain people - not listening to other people, eg Powell - secret transfers of money - and on and on
This would make me laugh if it weren't so pathetic.
Our Endorsement: Mangy Yellow Dog for President
In this time of change and uncertainty, we turn to new leadership that offers hope for a healing of the rift with our European allies and a new approach to the challenge to our security from Islamic militants. Mangy Yellow Dog alone can deliver on that promise.
Mangy Yellow Dog has the singular advantage of being completely non-threatening to our alienated allies, while still being able to bite back at any terrorists who might dare to attack.
Mangy Yellow Dog reminds us that there is ample room in our country for a new sense of humility... what America really needs now is not to take on the world alone. What we need is a pat on the head and a nice bath.
Vote Democrat Mangy Yellow Dog for President on Election Day.
ROTFLMAO!
NOW that's a WAPO candidate!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.