Little Saigon leads the Way: Cools to KERRY

Inland Valley Daily Bulletin ^ | 10/21/2004 | AP

[ALOHA RONNIE]

.

NEVER FORGET

Those who fought for their Freedom and had it taken right out from under them...

UNDERSTAND..!!!

Little Saigon is now leading the fight against JOHN KERRY's push to kill Freedom once again, right here in the good old USA.

Signed:.."ALOHA RONNIE" Guyer of Little Saigon / Van Tran for Assembly Campaign

NEVER FORGET

[Deb]

I adore the precious Vietnamese. They always come out to the pro-Bush rallies.

[ALOHA RONNIE]

.

Vietnam's "Re-Education" Prison Camps installed after the war in order to persecute the once Free South Vietnamese were tantamount to Cambodia's Killing Fields.

I have had my hand placed on the deep scars still left on the bodies of such Prison Camp survivors, horrible scars from the knife wounds inflicted upon them by their Communist North Vietnam Captors en masse.

...T'is not very difficult to NEVER FORGET this..

.

[ALOHA RONNIE]

.

...It was during Little Saigon's April 2003 'Pro-BUSH/Freedom for Iraq Rally' in Fountain Valley CA...

...that President BUSH first promised in writing...

...Freedom's return to Communist Vietnam, North Korea and Cuba...

...as well as Freedom's Arrival to all the countries of the Middle East during a BUSH Presidency...

...as America's best self-defense against future terrorist attacks here at home.

...In other words BUSH thinks so highly of our country's Vietnamese-American Community...

...that he gave them a Preview, a full year and a half in advance, of what he was to tell the rest of the world during his September 2, 2004 Republican Convention Acceptance Speech in which he re-named the 21st Century...

...The LIBERTY Century..!!!

.

[dagnabbit]

Someone needs to get their hands on the books written by "Madame" Nguyen Thi Binh about the Paris peace talks period, and to see if any mention is ever made of J. Kerry. He's silent about his collaboration with the communists. Perhaps, however, the communists weren't? Perhaps Madame Binh or someone else has described "an earnest young comrade from Amerika who came three times to Paris to exchange lists of names, US military plans, etc..." There may very well be something of that sort out there.

Here's one book: Mat tran dan toc giai phong Chinh phu cach mang lam thoi tai Hoi nghi Paris ve Viet Nam: hoi uc. Hanoi: Chinh tri quoc gia, 2001. 688 pp.

It may require someone with friends in Vietnam to get this book(s) from Vietnam, or maybe some are available here (doubt it, unless there are Vietnamese pro-communist book stores here). Regardless, Vietnamese language skills are needed.

I think that with some FedEx use, scanners and the Internet, there's still lots of time available to make public anything the communists have written about their encounters and cooperation with John Kerry.

[Deb]

Amen.

[Arizona Carolyn]

That's very good to know... and even better to know they are leaning Republican.

[Arizona Carolyn]

Do you think the BIG hit piece, a MAJOR newspaper is publishing Monday on Kerry, has to do with Vietnam? The teasers say it has to do with something "foreign" that he lied about?

[Arizona Carolyn]

I hope someone digs it up, Aloha Ronnie, before it's too late. People are early-voting in droves down in Florida.

[ALOHA RONNIE]

.

Ask and you shall receive from today's http://www.Newsmax.com & this week's Weekly Standard Magazine:



KERRY Covered up Second Meeting with Vietcong Negotiators

http://www.Newsmax.com/archives/ic/2004/10/24/30416.shtml

.

[risk]

As usual, Ronnie, thank you MUCH for the ping!

"FBI files reveal that Kerry planned a third such trip together with [VVAW leader Al] Hubbard for November [1971]. But, as it turned out, Hubbard went without Kerry, perhaps because the two had by then fallen out over revelations that Hubbard's repeated claims to have been an officer and a Vietnam vet were fabricated." -- last paragraph of Carl Limbacher's article above.

[VOA]

here's a link to the source article at The Weekly Standard (as best I can tell):

http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/004/824yefgv.asp

[Arizona Carolyn]

Ronnie -- you should make certain Joe Scarborough receives this with a note: Make Certain Lawrence O'Donnell see's it and that he owes the Swifties (in particular John O'Neil) an appology!

[Arizona Carolyn]

Could this be the BIG story that will hit a major Newspaper for publication tomorrow???

[dagnabbit]

Thanks - That's excellent stuff coming out now about Kerry lying about having made two trips, lying about a honeymoon reason for being in Paris, etc.

The clincher, however, and what would seal the deal for voters who can't quite see the treason in Kerry's Paris trips, however many he had, is the matter of what Kerry said in those meetings.

We know that blow-hard JK would never have just sat passively mute in those Paris hotel rooms, silently taking notes about the VC and the North's various demands. His ego would never have allowed it. No, John F. Kerry wasn't going to fly across the Atlantic, twice, just to be a mere note-taker. He undoubtedly told his communist hosts at some length, about all HE was doing to further their common cause, about how HE, JFK, was also thwarting US efforts on the battlefield and in the arena of public opinion. Perhaps to ingratiate himself with his hosts, he even provided some details of US military tactics or strategy.

Perhaps. There are likely only three parties that know for sure:

1. John Kerry
2. His Vietnamese communist hosts
3. The French Government

Parties one and two know because they were in the room(s). Party three knows because there is no way the French would have allowed the Vietnamese Communists, The South Vietnamese and the Americans to run around town deciding the fate of the former French Indochina without Paris knowing what was going on. No, the French would have made certain they were kept well abreast of thing. Which is to say, it's pretty safe to assume the Frogs, no strangers to clandestine monitoring, did their best to bug all those meetings and the parties' hotel rooms as well.

At this point, none of the three parties are going to say anything. JK, obviously, has no interest in making public the details of his wartime collaboration with the enemy. The French don't either. Why should they embarrass a presidential candidate, when they hold the goods that would let them OWN a sitting U.S. President? Ditto for the Vietnamese. US President who calls them daddy, or scandal-destroyed failed candidate? Easy choice for Hanoi.

But it's only that party, the Vietnamese communists, who appear to have written at length about their work and dealings in Paris. (Kerry and the French intelligence services certainly haven't). So it's in their writings, particularly in those of Madame Bihn, where one should look for any reference to what John Kerry (or a Kerry-like figure) said and did in those Paris hotel rooms.

[dagnabbit]

Good point - though I'd call this a relatively mild tone for an FR thread regarding John Kerry!

Freep-mailing you.

[risk]

Why should they embarrass a presidential candidate, when they hold the goods that would let them OWN a sitting U.S. President?

What an interesting perspective. The French may like Kerry for the blackmail they may well have on him.